Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/187/2024 of PUCHA ATCHI REDDY Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 8 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, THE 9 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 187/2024 Between: 1. PUCHA ATCHI REDDY, RESIDENT OF D.NO.2 MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT,
APHC010007882024
IN TH
THURS
THE HONOURA
CO
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. PUCHA ATCHI RE RESIDENT OF D MANDAL, PRAKAS
1. THE STATE OF SECRETARY, PAN SECRETARIAT BU PRADESH.
2. THE STATE OF PRINCIPAL SE DEPARTMENT, AMARAVATHI. CO PER COURT ORDE
3. M GIRIJA SHA PANCHAYAT RAJ A ANDHRA PRADESH
4. SRI A S DINES COLLECTOR,PRAK AS PER COURT O CC NO-187 OF 202
5. THE EXECUTIVE E DISTRICT. E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SDAY, THE 9th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL ONTEMPT CASE NO: 187/2024 DDY, S/O VENKATA SWAMY , AGE D.NO.2- 184,BOTLA PALEM VIL SAM DISTRICT AND ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY NCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DE UILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAV ANDHRA PRADESH DISMISSE ECRETARY, FINANCE AND SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, ONTEMPT CASE IS DISMISSED AG ER DATED 17/10/25 IN CC NO-187 O NKAR, COMMISSIONER, DEPA AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT GOV H, VIJAYAWADA. SH KUMAR I A S, THE THE KASAM DISTRICT. R 4 CAUSE TIT ORDER DATED 09.03.2026, VIDE IA
24. ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, ONGOL DESH
LAPATI ED 45 YEARS, LAGE, DARSI ...PETITIONER Y PRINCIPAL EVELOPMENT, VATI. ANDHRA ED, REP. BY PLANNING VELAGAPUDI, AINST R 2 AS OF 2024. RTMENT OF VERNMENT OF EN DISTRICT TLE AMENDED A NO-1/2026 IN LE PRAKASAM
6. GONAVATHI CHINAKASI NAIK, S/O BEEMA NAIK, SECRETARY, BOTLAPALEM GRAM PANCHYAT DARSI MANDALAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. R1, R2 AND R5 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to take cognizance of the contempt committed by the Contemnors/respondents here In and punish them with maximum imprisonment under section 10 to 12 of the contempt of courts act4971 r/w Article 215 of the constitution of India for utter disobedience and disregard shown to the orders passed by the Honourable A.P. High Court dated 04/09/2023 passed in W.P. 11302/2023 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to discharge this respondent from the contempt case No. 187 of 2024 in the circumstances explained and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner/ 6th respondent herein before this Hon'ble High Court as per the orders dated 19-09-2025 in C.C.No. 187 of 2024 and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the Proposed Respondent No. 7 as the Respondent No. 7 in CC.No. 187 of 2024 for proper adjudication of the said writ petition, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit petitioner to amend the cause title of the description of the 4th respondent to be substituted as Sri A.S. Dinesh Kumar I.A.S, the then District Collector, Prakasam District in the place of E.E. Marri Koteswara Rao, District
Collector and DPC Prakasam District, Ongole in the Contempt case CC.NO: 187 of 2024 in W.P.NO 11302 of 2023 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRINIVASULU P Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI
3. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI
4. G VENKATA REDDY
5. The Court made the following order:
This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 14.09.2023 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.11302 of 2023.
Sri Shaik Mehmud Ali, learned counsel, representing Sri P.Srinivasulu, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that respondent authorities have complied with the order dated 14.09.2023 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.11302 of 2023, hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the Contempt Case. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any in the Contempt Case, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 09.07.2026 MP
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CONTEMPT CASE NO:187 of 2024 Date: 09.07.2026
MP