Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/18907/2023 of M/S. BRC CONSTRUCTIONS Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 7 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010367612023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE 8 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18907/2023 Between: 1. M/S. BRC CONSTRUCTIONS, REP.BY ITS. MANAGING PARTNER, B. RAVICHANDRA, S/O.

Date of reserved for orders

Date of pronouncement

Date of uploading :

APHC010367612023

IN TH

WEDNE

THE HONOURA

WR

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. M/S. BRC CONSTR B. RAVICHANDRA YEARS, OCC. CO BESIDE DATTA GA WEST GODAVARI

1. THE STATE OF A SECRETARY, R SECRETARIAT BU DISTRICT.

2. THE ENGINEER VIJAYAWADA, KRIS

3. THE SUPERINTEN WEST GODAVARI

4. THE EXECUTIVE E GODAVARI DISTRI

5. THE STATE OF A SECRETARY, DE SECRETARIAT BU DISTRICT s : : 08.07.2026 E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL RIT PETITION NO: 18907/2023 RUCTIONS, REP.BY ITS. MANAGIN A, S/O. DASARADHARAMAIAH, AGE ONTRACTOR, D.NO. 5-10/1, VID AYATRI PEETHAM, VATLURU(V), P DISTRICT. AND ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT ROADS AND BUILDINGS D UILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVA INCHIEF, (RANDB), NABARD SHNA DISTRICT. NDING ENGINEER, R AND B CIR DISTRICT. ENGINEER, , R AND B, ELURU DIV ICT. ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT EPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND UILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVA ...RES DESH

LAPATI NG PARTNER, ED ABOUT 52 DYUT NAGAR, PEDAPADU(M), ...PETITIONER TS PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT, ATHI, GUNTUR AND LWE, RCLE, ELURU, VISION, WEST TS PRINCIPAL D PLANNING, ATHI, GUNTUR SPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondents in Withholding the payment of amount of Rs.48,32,030/- (CFMS.No.2023- 456993) even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the work i.e. Improvements to Gundugoluru-Korukollu road from Km.0.000 to 5.600 in West Godavari district, vide agreement No.153/2018-19, dt.06.02.2019, is questioned, as the same is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider for payment of Rs.48,32,030/- (CFMS.No.2023-456993) with interest @12percent per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of above-mentioned work forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents consider the payment of Rs.48,32,030/ (CFMS.No.2023- 456993) even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the work i.e. "Improvements to Gundugoluru-Korukollu road from Km.0.000 to 5.600 in West Godavari district", vide agreement No.153/ 2018-19, dt.06.02.2019, forthwith, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS

2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

The Court made the following order:

The grievance of the petitioner is that despite finalization of bills payable to it in relation to the work i.e., ‘Improvements to Gundugoluru-Korukollu road from Km 0.000 to 5.600 in West Godavari District’, vide agreement No.153/2018-19, dated 06.02.2019, the respondent authorities have failed to release the payment of an amount of Rs.48,32,030/-

2. When the matter is taken up for consideration today, Sri P.Anand Surya, learned counsel, representing Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the respondent authorities have released the entitled amount to the petitioner and the petitioner has received the same. Hence, no further orders are required to be passed in this Writ Petition and prayed to close the Writ Petition.

3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 08.07.2026 MP Whether the order is: Speaking  Reasoned

Reportable

Non-reportable 

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION No.18907 of 2023 Dated : 08.07.2026

MP

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead