Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/4371/2025 of MARUTHI CONSTRUCTIONS Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 7 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading APHC010079232025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE 8 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 4371/2025 Between: 1. MARUTHI CONSTRUCTIONS, REP., BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, D, NAGESWARA PRASAD S/O

Date of reserved for orders

Date of pronouncement

Date of uploading

APHC010079232025

IN TH

WEDNE

THE HONOURA

W

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. MARUTHI CONSTR D, NAGESWARA YEARS, OCC CON 14/1-9/5, BHARA KRISHNA DISTRIC

1. THE STATE OF PRINCIPAL SECRE SECRETARIAT BU

2. THE DISTRICT CO

3. THE VIJAYAWADA ITS COMMISSIONE

4. THE SUPERINTE VIJAYAWADA, KR

5. EXECUTIVE ENG KRISHNA DISTRIC

6. THE STATE OF PRINCIPAL SECRE s : : 08.07.2026 : E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL RIT PETITION NO: 4371/2025 RUCTIONS, REP., BY ITS MANAGIN PRASAD S/O BHEEMAIAH, AGE NTRACTOR, HAVING ITS OFFICE ATHI NAGAR, 4TH CROSS, T AND ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESEN ETARY, ROADS AND BUILDINGS D ILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR D LLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT V A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REPR ER, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTR ENDING ENGINEER, (R AND ISHNA DISTRICT INEER, (R AND B) DIVISION, T ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESEN ETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, S DESH

LAPATI NG PARTNER, ED ABOUT 45 E AT D.NO.54- VIJAYAWADA, ...PETITIONER NTED BY ITS DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT VIJAYAWADA RESENTED BY RICT B) CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA, NTED BY ITS SECRETARIAT

BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS action of the Respondents herein, in withholding the payment of an amount of Rs.43,55,420/- even after finalizing the bills payable to the petitioner in relation to the work i.e., URGENT REPAIRS TO DAMAGED WING WALL TO ROB IN KM.4/6 OF LINK ROAD CONNECTING NH 9 TO NH 5 THROUGH INDRAKEELADRI TUNNEL ROAD IN VIJAYAWADA CITY LIMITS IN NTR DISTRICT, as per the Agreement CR.No.07/2023-24, Dt. 26.09.2023 is questioned, as the same is illegal and arbitrary apart from violative of Articles 14, 16, 19 85 300- A of The Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider for payment of Rs.43,55,420/- with an interest @24PERCENT per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of above-mentioned work., forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the respondents to consider for payment of bill of Rs.43,55,420/-, with regard to the completion of work i.e., “URGENT REPAIRS TO DAMAGED WING WALL TO ROB IN KM.4/6 OF LINK ROAD CONNECTING NH 9 TO NH 5 THROUGH INDRAKEELADRI TUNNEL ROAD IN VIJAYAWADA CITY LIMITS IN NTR DISTRICT, as per the Agreement CR.No.07/2023-24, Dt. 26.09.2023 with an interest @24% per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS

2. S.V.S.S.SIVARAM SC For VMC

3. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

The Court made the following order:

The grievance of the petitioner is that despite finalization of bills payable to it in relation to the work i.e., ‘Urgent repairs to damaged wing wall to ROB in KM.4/6 of link road connecting NH 9 to NH 5 through Indrakeeladri Tunnel road in Vijayawada City limits in NTR District as per the Agreement CR.No.07/2023-24, dated 26.09.2023, the respondent authorities have failed to release the payment of an amount of Rs.43,55,420/-

2. When the matter is taken up for consideration today, Sri P.Anand Surya, learned counsel, representing Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the respondent authorities have released the entitled amount to the petitioner and the petitioner has received the same. Hence, no further orders are required to be passed in this Writ Petition and prayed to close the Writ Petition.

3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 08.07.2026 MP Whether the order is: Speaking  Reasoned

Reportable

Non-reportable 

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION No.4371 of 2025 Dated : 08.07.2026

MP

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead