Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/14805/2026 of G. Venkatalakshamma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 7 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

for orders : Date of pronouncement : 08.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010284362026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14805/2026 Between:

Date of reserved for orders :

Date of pronouncement : 08.07.2026

Date of uploading :

APHC010284362026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 14805/2026

Between:

1. G. VENKATALAKSHAMMA, W/O G. RAMACHANDRAIAH, AGED

ABOUT

YEARS,

R/O

JHANMABHOOMI

COLONY,

MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY,

MUNICIPAL

ADMINISTRATION

AND

URBAN

DEVELOPMENT

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT

BUILDINGS,

AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. - 522 237

2. MADANAPALLE

MUNICIPALITY,

REP.

BY

ITS

MUNICIPAL

COMMISSIONER, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. - 517

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus challenging the action of the 2nd Respondent in threatening to demolish and dispossess the petitioner from her property to the extent of Ac.0.03 percent cents situated in Survey No. 102-3, 102-14 and 102-15 of Jhanmabhoomi Colony, Madanapalle, Annamayya District, erstwhile Chittoor District without following the due process of law is questioned as the same is arbitrary, illegal. contrary to the well-established

legal principles apart from being violative of fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed under articles 14,19,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent not to demolish and dispossess the petitioner from her property to the extent of Ac. 0.03 percent cents situated in Survey No. 102-3, 102-14 and 102- 15 of Jhanmabhoomi Colony, Madanapalle, Annamayya District, erstwhile Chittoor District without following due process of law and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to Direct the 2nd Respondent not to demolish and dispossess the petitioner from her property to the extent of Ac.0.03 percent cents situated in Survey No. 102-3, 102- 14 and 102-15 of Jhanmabhoomi Colony, Madanapalle, Annamayya District, erstwhile Chittoor District forthwith, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. CHAITANYA PALISETTY

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order:-

This Court, after considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, directed the respondent authority to follow the due process of law before attempting any demolition of the alleged unauthorized construction.

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent, on oral instructions, submits that the notice dated 05.05.2026 was served on 06.05.2026 and that the respondents shall issue a fresh notice and follow the due process of law while taking action against the petitioner's construction.

3. Recording the same, this writ petition stands disposed of, making it clear to the 2nd respondent to follow the due process of law by issuing a fresh show cause notice, calling for the petitioner's explanation, and passing appropriate orders with regard to the further construction. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N

08.07.2026 PNS

Whether the order is: Speaking

Reasoned ☑ Reportable

Non-reportable ☑

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead