WP/3891/2006 of The General Manager (Rep. U.O.I) Vs Yerri Swamy on 7 July 2026

APHC010071352006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

1

‘'.

a

WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBERIjg |

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

V/-

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

lA No.3 OF 2025

IN

WRIT PETITION NO: 3891 OF 2nnfi

lA No.3 OF 2025

Between:

1. The General

Manager,

Rep.

U.O.I,

South

Central

Railway

Nilayam, Secunderabad.

2. The Chief Personnel Officer, South Central Railway, Rail Nilayam, Secunderabad.

3. The Divisional Railway Manager, South Central Railway, Guntakal Division, Guntakal.

4. The Additional Divisional Railway Manager, South Central Railway, Guntakal Division, Guntakal.

5. The

Senior

Guntakal Division, Guntakal.

Rail

Divisional Personnel

Officer,, South Central Railway

6. The Senior Divisional Engineer (Co-Ordination), South Central Railway Guntakal Division, Guntakal.

7. The Assistant

Divisional Engineer (Special Works), South Central Railway, Guntakal Division, Guntakal.

...PETITIONERS

AND

1.

Yerri Swamy, S/o. Thippanna, Ex-Gangman, G.No. 10/Bellary, R/o.

Sidurpadu Village, Bevanala Post, Alarvi Mandal, Kurnool District.

2.

The Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, HACA Bhavan, Opp; Public Garden, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may graciously be pleased to restore the WP No. 3891 of 2006, on the file of this Hon’ble court by setting aside the order, dated 05-12-2024.

WRIT PETITION NO: 3891 OF 2006

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari after calling for the records relating to and connected with order in O.A.No. 1334/2004 dt. 8-9-2005 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (Respondent No.2) and quash the same by declaring it illegal, arbitrary, perverse and against to the statutory Rules and the law.

LA NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP 4852 OF 2Qnfi)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order in O.A.No. 1334/2004

dt.

8-9-2005

of

the

Central

Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (Respondent No,.2) pending disposal the above writ petition.

of

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VENNA HEMANTH KUMAR(CENTRAL

GOVERNMENT COUNSEL)

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI ADHI VENKATESWARA RAO

Counsel for the Respondent No.2:--

The Court made the following: ORDER

Considering

1[he

submissions

made

with

reference

to

the

averments made in^ffidavit filed in support of the I.A., the Writ Petition is restored to file by setting aside the order dated 05.12.2024.

Sd/- K SRINIVASA RAJU

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

fit

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1. The Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, HACA Bhavan, Opp: Public Garden, Hyderabad.

One CC to Sri Venna Hemanth Kumar(Central Government Counsel)

[OPUC]

One CC to Sri Adhi Venkateswara Rao, Advocate [OPUC]

Two CD Copies

2.

3.

4.

ssb

HIGH COURT

DATED: 15/10/2025