WP/25991/2006 of Governament of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Vs Pyla Govinda Rao on 7 July 2026

1. GOVERNAMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SECRETARY, IRRIGATION & CAD (P.W) DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETAIAT, HYDERABAD.

2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, NORTH COAST, I & CAD DEPARTMENT,, PEDA WALTAIR, OPP. A.U. REGISTRAR OFFICE, VISAKHAPATNAM.

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN OF THE SELECTION, COMMITTEE FOR DISPLACED PERSONS, SRIKAKULAM.

4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER,, VAMSAHARA PROJECT CIRCLE, ILLISIPURAM, SRIKAKUALM.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. PYLA GOVINDA RAO, S/O. APPAYYA UN-EMPLOYEE R/O. BHAGIRADHAPURAM, HIRAMANDALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

2. P RAMA SIVAJI, S/O. RAGHAVA RAO UN-EMPLOYEE R/O. KORADA VILLAGE, HIRAMANDALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

3. PANDRETI APPANNA, S./O. SRIRAMULU UN-EMPLOYEE R/O. KORADA VILLAGE, HIRAMANDALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

4. A NARAYANA RAO, S/O. VENKATA RAO UN-EMPLOYEE R/O. BRAMMA COLONY, TEKKALI POST, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

5. DANDASI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. ADINARAYANA UN-EMPLOYEE R/O. PEDDASRU VEEDHI, TEKKALI POST, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

6. K TIRUPATHI RAO, S/O. KOTESWARA RAO UN-EMPLOYEE R/O. DEVARASETTI VEEDHI, HIRAMANDALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

7. K NARAYANA RAO, S/O. KOTESWARA RAO UN-EMPLOYEE R/O. PEDAKOLLIVALASA VILLAGE, L.N. PETA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

8. PANDIRI PARVATEESAM, S/O. CHINNAVADU UN-EMPLOYEE R/O. KORADA VILLAGE, HIRAMANDALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ order or a direction more particularly one in the nature of the writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in OA No. 1071 of 2006 dt. 2-5-2006 dt. 2-5-2006 and quash the same as perverse an in excess of the jurisdiction.

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the judgement rendered by the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad passed in the OA No. 1071/2006 dt. 2-5-2006 pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass such other order or orders in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased

To fix an early date for hearing of the above WP NO. 25991/2006 in the interest of justice.

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the writ petition by fixing an early date of hearing and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES II Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. P KRISHNA REDDY

2. AKKAM ESHWAR The Court made the following:

ORDER :-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

Sri K.Ramalingeswara Rao, learned Government Pleader for Services-II appearing for the petitioners, submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time.

2. Recording the submission as aforesaid, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.

____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J

_____________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI, J Date : 08.07.2026. RPD.

Whether the order is : Speaking ✔ Yes/ No Reasoned ✔ Yes/ No Reportable ✔ Yes/ No Non-Reportable ✔ Yes/ No

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI

(DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS)

WRIT PETITION NO: 25991 of 2006

Date: 08.07.2026

RPD.