Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/21840/2021 of Smt. J.Bharathamma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 7 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

for orders : NIL Date of pronouncement :08.07.2026 Date of uploading : .07.2026 APHC010358592021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 21840 of

Date of reserved for orders : NIL

Date of pronouncement :08.07.2026

Date of uploading

: .07.2026

APHC010358592021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3457]

WEDNESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 21840 of 2021

Between:

1. SMT. J.BHARATHAMMA, , W/O. LATE G.PRAKASHA BABU, AGED

ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC - GOVT.EMPLOYEE, R/O.D.NO.16/620-2-4, SESHAPPATHOTA, MADANAPALLE TOWN AND MUNICIPALITY, CHITTOOR DISTRICT

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY

MA

AND

UD

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT,

VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. MADANAPALLE MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or direction declaring the in action of the Respondent No.2 in not paying the arrears of legal fees to the petitioner for the services rendered by her husband late Sri.G.

Prakash Babu, Advocate inspite of several personal approaches, requests and representation dated 16-07-2021 claiming the same through various bills as illegal, improper, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently to direct the 2nd Respondent to pay the arrears of legal fees to the petitioner for the services rendered by her husband late Sri.G. Prakash Babu, Advocate forthwith IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to pay the arrears of legal fees to the petitioner for the services rendered by her husband late Sri.G. Prakash Babu, Advocate forthwith by considering the representation dated 16-07-2021 pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SHAIK MEERAVALI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. N RANGA REDDY

2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV

The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 21840 of 2021

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:-

Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 08.07.2026.

KK Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead