Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/40420/2022 of DANTHULURI RAMAKRISHNA VINOBHA RAJU Vs The state of Andhra Pradesh on 6 July 2026
for orders : Date of pronouncement : 07.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010682682022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 40420/2022
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement : 07.07.2026
Date of uploading :
APHC010682682022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 40420/2022
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. DANTHULURI RAMAKRISHNA VINOBHA RAJU, S/O. LATE BUCHI VENKATAPATHI RAJU
AGED ABOUT
YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
R/O 68-10A-21, RAJESWARI NAGAR, GAIGOLUPADU, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATHI.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , ANAKAPALLY DISTRICT, ANAKAPALLI.
3. THE TAHSILDAR, NAKKAPALLI MANDAL, ANKAPALLI DISTRICT.
4. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, GUNUPUDI VILLAGE, NAKKAPALLI MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT.
5. DANTHULURI RAMESH RAJU, S/O VARAHA NARASIMHA RAJU, R/O PAIYAKARAO PETA, MANDAL, GOPLAPATNAM VILLAGE,ANAKAPALLI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT.
6. DANTHULURI GOPINATH, S/O SATYANARAYANA RAJU, R/O PAIYAKARAO PETA, MANDAL, GOPLAPATNAM
VILLAGE,ANAKAPALLI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring inaction of the Respondents to admeasuring Ac.12-14 cents in Sy.No.77 and Ac.7-40 Cents in Sy.No.78 total Ac.19-54 Cents situated at Gunupudi Village, Nakkapally Mandal, Ankapalli District is highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust and against the article 14. 21 and 300-A of the constitution of India and also against the principles of natural justice and also against the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Record of Rights Act and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 to make the corrections in revenue records by deleting the name of Respondent Nos.5 and 6 by considering the representation of the Petitioner dt.11.11.2022 and entered the name of Petitioner in Revenue records and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.3 to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the Petitioner dt.11.11.2022 and mutate the name of Petitioner in Revenue records pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G V V S VARA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. VENKATESWARLU SANISETTY
The Court made the following order:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the writ petition became infructuous and hence prayed to dismiss the writ petition.
2. Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 07.07.2026 BRS
Whether the order is :
Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No