WP/11682/2013 of P Krishna Reddy, Vs The Municipal Commissioner, on 6 July 2026

Date of pronouncement

: 07.07.2026

Date of uploading

:13.07.2026

APHC010512392013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 11682/2013

Between:

1. P KRISHNA REDDY,, S/O KONDA REDDY HINDU AGED 39 YEARS, H NO.29-1502/22/1/3 ROAD NO.1, KAKATIYA NAGAR, NEREDMET

SECUNDERABAD-56.

2. MOOLE VENKATESWARA REDDY,, S/O VENKATA REDDY HINDU

AGE 38 YEARS, R/O D NO.7-4-404/7 BALANAGAR, RR DISTRICT

3. B BRAHMAKRISHNA REDDY,, S/O MUSALA REDDY AGE 27

YEARS,

CHERLOPALLY

MANDAL,

NAREDPALLY

VILLAGE,

KANIGIRI TALUK AND MANDAL PRAKSAM DISTRICT

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, Vinukonda Municipality,Vinukonda Tluk, Guntur District

...RESPONDENT

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order more especially one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari call for records pertaining to the Endorsement in Roc. No.

296/A12013 /G1, Dated 23.3.2013, issued by the respondent refusing the approval of plan for construction of a house in D No. 29-1699 in S.No. 399/1A, Narasaraopet Road, Vinukonda, Guntur Dist., as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and quash the same and against the documents placed before the respondent which includes the orders passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh in several writ petitions from time to time, and consequentially suspend the Endorsement Roc. No. 296/A/2013 /G1, Dated 23.3.2013, issued by the respondent refusing the approval of plan for construction of a house in D No. 29-1699 in S.No. 399/1A, Narasaraopet Road, Vinukonda, Guntur dt, as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and against the documents placed before the respondent which includes the orders passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh in several writ petitions from time to time and consequentially direct the respondent to collect L.R.S. charges for the land in question and grant permission for construction of a house in D No. 291699 in S.No. 399/1A, Narasaraopet Road, Vinukonda, Guntur Dist., and pass

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased

to suspend the Endorsement Roc. No. 296/A/2013 /G1, Dated 23.3.2013, issued by the respondent refusing the approval of plan for construction of a house in D No. 29-1699 in S.No. 399/1A, Narasaraopet Road, Vinukonda, Guntur Dist., as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and against the documents placed before the respondent which includes the orders passed by the Hon 'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh in several writ petitions from time to time and pass

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to collect L.R.S. charges for the land in question and grant permission for construction of a house in D No. 29-1699 in S.No.

399/1A, Narasaraopet Road, Vinukonda, Guntur Dist., and pass

IA NO: 6 OF 2013(WPMP 91959 OF 2013

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to restore the W.P.No. 11682/2013 by setting aside the dismissed for non prosecution order dated 06-05-2024 in the interest of justice IA NO: 2 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to condone the delay of 230 days in filing the Restoration Petition in W.P.No. 11682/2013 in the interest of justice IA NO: 3 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the petitioners to engage new counsel by filing fresh vakalat as they lost contact with earlier counsel and as such could not get NOC vakalat, in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. RAVI SHANKAR JANDHYALA

Counsel for the Respondent:

1. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI SC For MUNICIPALITIES

2. 99/B D MAHESWARA REDDY

The Court made the following:

WRIT PETITION NO: 11682 of 2013