Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/8778/2026 of SRI NIDANAMPATI SRILAKSHMI VADDERA LABOUR SOCIETY Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 6 July 2026
for orders : Date of pronouncement : 07.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010155802026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 8778/2026 Between: 1.
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement : 07.07.2026
Date of uploading :
APHC010155802026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 8778/2026
Between:
1. SRI NIDANAMPATI SRILAKSHMI VADDERA LABOUR SOCIETY, SOCIETY REGN. NO. 85 OF 2021, D.NO. 8-29-64/110, GANESH
NAGAR, WARD NO. 22, AGATHAVARAPPADU, PEDAKAKANI, GUNTUR. REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, DURGAM MALLESWARI, W/O
JOJAPPA, AGED 45 YEARS, D.NO. 8-29-64/121, GANESH NAGAR, PEDAKAKANI, GUNTUR.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
MUNICIPAL
ADMINISTRATION
DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522237.
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND
PLANNING A.P SECRETARIATBUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR
DISTRICT 522237.
3. THE
ANDHRA
PRADESH
COMPREHENSIVE,
FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (CFMS), NEAR NRI HOSPITAL, AUTONAGAR, MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH 522503. REP.
BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.
4. THE
COMMISSIONER
AND
DIRECTOR,
OF
MUNICIPAL
ADMINISTRATION, ANDHRA PRADESH, APCRDA PROJECT
OFFICE, 4TH FLOOR, RAYAPUDI POST, TULLURU MANDAL, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522237.
5. THE DIRECTORATE OF TREASURIES AND ACCOUNTS, REP. BY
ITS DIRECTOR OF WORKS AND ACCOUNTS DOOR NO 7-57, SRI
ANJANEYA
TOWERS,
BHIMARAJU
GUTTA,
VTPS
ROAD,
IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA-521456,
6. THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, GUNTUR DISTRICT. R AND B
QUARTERS, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH 522004
7. PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, TREASURIES AND ACCOUNTS, GUNTUR. R AND B QUARTERS, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH
522004
8. THE BAPATLA MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, BAPATLA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 522101.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the admitted due amounts Rs 4,25,648/-, Rs 4,22,046/-, Rs 4,55,758/- and Rs 4,42,043/- respectively totaling Rs 17,45,495/- (Seventeen lakhs Forty Five thousand four hundred and ninety five) payable to petitioner for the 4 works executed for 8th respondent by the petitioner, under their respective agreements Bearing Nos 37/2025-26 (dated 03- 06-2025),38/2025-26 (dated 03-06-2025),52/2025-26 (dated 23-09- 2025) and 53/2025-26 (dated 23-09-
2025), despite finalizing the bills, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents herein to immediately pay the total due amounts of Rs 4,25,648/-, Rs 4,22,046/-, Rs 4,55,758/- and Rs 4,42,043/- respectively totaling Rs 17,45,495/- (Seventeen lakhs Forty Five thousand four hundred and ninety five) payable to petitioner in relation to the above 4
works executed for 8TH respondent under the said agreements with an interest @ 12 PERCENT per annum and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
direct the respondents herein to release the due amounts of Rs 4,25,648/-, Rs 4,22,046/-, Rs 4,55,758/- and Rs 4,42,043/- respectively totaling Rs 17,45,495/- (Seventeen lakhs Forty- Five thousand four hundred and ninety- five) payable to petitioner in relation to 4 works executed for 8* respondent under agreements bearing No’s. 37/2025-26 (dated 03-06-2025),38/2025-26
(dated 03-06-2025), 52/2025-26 (dated 23-09-2025), and 53/2025-26 (dated 23-09-2025), respectively within a stipulated time frame and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI SC For MUNICIPALITIES
2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP
3. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:-
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was entrusted with the works i.e., (i) Providing and Laying 200mm OD HDPE class 10kg/cm2 distribution Pipe line from Amma Vari Chettu (Vepu Chettu) to Kapau Kalyana Mandapam beside Thavva Kaluva at 14th ward in Bapatla Municipality, vide Agreement No.37/2025-26, dated 03.06.2025, (ii) Providing and Laying of 160mm OD HDPE class 100-8kg/cm2 distribution Pipe line from Kapu Kalayana Mandapam Hanumantha Rao Colony Arch 14th ward in Bapatla Municipality, vide Agreement No.38/2025-26, dated 03.06.2025
(iii) Providing and Laying of 200mm OD HDPE class 100-8kg/cm2 distribution Pipe line from Ch.Vinay Chowdary house to Thotakura Venkateswarlu House at 14th ward in Bapatla Municipality, vide Agreement No.52/2025-26, dated 23.09.2025 and (iv) Providing and Laying of 200mm OD HDPE class 100-8kg/cm2 distribution Pipe line from Thotakura Venkateswarlu House to Royal Medicals at 14th ward in Bapatla Municipality, vide Agreement No.53/2025-26, dated 23.09.2025.
2. It is submitted that the petitioner had completed the works entrusted to her and that the competent authority of the respondents had also approved the payments due and payable to the petitioner. The respondents have also recorded the progress of the works and the amounts due and payable to the petitioner in the M-Book.
3. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Smt.V.Sireesha Rani, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Municipality and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance and Planning.
4. During the course of hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Municipality, on written instructions, submits that the bills were approved for clearance, that funds were also released by the Government for clearing the outstanding bills of the contractors, and that the amounts due and payable to the petitioner have been duly admitted. It is submitted that further funds are awaited and that, soon after the release of the funds, the bills due and payable to the petitioner shall be cleared.
5. Recording the submissions, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage, directing the respondents to verify and release the payments due and payable to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
6. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 07.07.2026 PNS Whether the order is: Speaking
Reasoned ☑ Reportable
Non-reportable ☑