Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/979/2010 of GAMIDI SRINIVASA RAO Vs GAMIDI VENKATA LAKSHMI on 5 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3603] MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 979/2010 Between: 1. GAMIDI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O RAMA RAO R/O
APHC010209402010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 979/2010
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. GAMIDI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O RAMA RAO R/O VEERAVASARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT AND
1. GAMIDI VENKATA LAKSHMI, W/o Srinivasa Rao C/o Pothula Sriramulu Nadapanavari palem, Veeravasaram Mandal,
...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CMAMP 2210 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 1556 days in representing the CMA Counsel for the Appellant:
1. P N MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent:
1. K K DURGA PRASAD
The Court made the following:
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh) The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed aggrieved by the order passed in H.M.O.P.No.110/2001 dated 30.12.2005 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Bhimavaram. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has no instructions from the appellant. A perusal of the docket order dated 03.3.2026 shows that parties are not in touch with the counsel and today also the same was represented by the learned counsel for the appellant. Considering the same, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution giving liberty that if parties intend to agitate their rights, they can file an application for restoration and if any application is filed for restoration, the same may be considered. No costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
__________________________ JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR 06.7.2026 RD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.1058 of 2010 06.7.2026 RD