Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/2068/2026 of SANJEEVA CONSTRUCTIONS Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 5 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading APHC010029892026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE 6 PRESENT:THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 2068/2026 Between: 1. SANJEEVA CONSTRUCTIONS, RT 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, RT Petition

Date of reserved for orders

Date of pronouncement

Date of uploading

APHC010029892026

IN TH

MOND

PRESENT:THE HON

W

Between:

1. SANJEEVA CONS

1. THE STATE OF A

Petition under Articl

circumstances stated in

pleased to

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Secti

in the affidavit filed in su

to direct the respondent

to the petitioners for the

36/2023-24, dated 09-11

writ petition and to pass

Counsel for the Petition

1.VENKAT SAILENDR

Counsel for the Respon

1.GP FOR ROADS B

The Court made the foll

s :

: 06.06.2026

: 08.06.2026

E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

DAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026

OURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEE

RIT PETITION NO: 2068/2026

STRUCTIONS, RT

AND

ANDHRA PRADESH, RT

...R

le 226 of the Constitution of India pra

the affidavit filed therewith, the High

on 151 CPC praying that in the circum

pport of the petition, the High Court m

authorities to release an amount of R

e execution of works, vide LS Agree

1-2023, respectively, pending dispos

ner:

RA G

ndent:

BUILDINGS

lowing:

RC,J

W.P.No.2068 of 2026

DESH

EMALAPATI

...PETITIONER

RESPONDENT

aying that in the

h Court may be

mstances stated

may be pleased

Rs. 2,52,18,297/-

ement C.R. No.

sal of the above

RC,J

W.P.No.2068 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent authorities in not releasing the amounts to the petitioner for the works executed by it.

2. Ms. S.Manaswi, learned counsel, representing Sri Venkat Sailendra G., learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner had received the amount claimed in this writ petition and hence nothing remains for adjudication in this writ petition and the same can be closed.

3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 6th July, 2026 RR Whether the order is :   Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No   Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead