Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/2296/2024 of S K D V PRASAD Vs THE STATE OF AP on 5 July 2026
for orders : -------- Date of pronouncement : 06.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010043002024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO:
Date of reserved for orders : --------
Date of pronouncement : 06.07.2026
Date of uploading
:
APHC010043002024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
Between:
1. S K D V PRASAD, S/O PALLAM RAJU, AGED 59 YEARS, DIST. PROH. AND
EXCISE OFFICER, KAKINADA AND DEPOT MANAGER, SAMAIKOTA, R/O
C/O APPANNA, SUDHA COLONY, PEDDAPURAM, KAKINADA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE
(EXCISE)
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION AND EXCISE, GOVERNMENT OF
ANDHRA PRADESH, EXCISE COMPLEX, RS N0.88-2B, SAI VIHAR
APARTMENTS,
POULTRY
FARM
ROAD,
PRASADAMPADU
(V),
VIJAYAWADA-521108.
3. THE A P STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION LIMITED, REP. BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, EXCISE COMPLEX, RS NO.88-2B, SAI VIHAR
APARTMENTS,
POULTRY
FARM
ROAD,
PRASADAMPADU
(V),
VIJAYAWADA-521108.
4. THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER, ANDHRA PRADESH, ELECTION
COMMISSION OF INDIA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
5. N VENKATA RAMANA, DEPOT MANAGER, APSBCL, ANAKAPALLI.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the G.O.Rt.No.104, Revenue (Excise) Dept., Dt.25.01.2024 (Impugned Order) issued by Respondent No.1 in so far as posting the 5th respondent as Depot Manager of APSBCL, Kakinada (wrongly typed instead of Samalkota) as illegal, arbitrary and violation of provisions of Section 5 of the Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 and consequently to set aside the same to the extent of posting the 5 th respondent as Depot Manager of APSBCL, Samalkota and pass affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the G.O.Rt.No.104, Revenue (Excise) Dept, dt 25.01.2024 issued by Respondent No.1 in so far as posting the 5th respondent as Depot Manager of APSBCL, Kakinada (wrongly typed instead of Samalkota), pending disposal of the writ petition and pass affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 30.01.2024 in W.P.No.2296 of 2024 and dismiss the WP, as there are no merits what so ever therein and pass affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 30.01.2024 passed in IA.No.1 of 2024 in W.P.No.2296 of 2024
and dismiss the writ petition with costs Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KISHORE KUMAR.A
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. DEVARAKONDA VENKATAIAH
2. Y SUDHAKAR
3. GP FOR SERVICES I (AP)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The present Writ Petition is filed for the following relief: “…..to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the G.O.Rt.No.104, Revenue (Excise) Dept., Dt.25.01.2024 (Impugned Order) issued by Respondent No.1 in so far as posting the 5th respondent as Depot Manager of APSBCL, Kakinada (wrongly typed instead of Samalkota) as illegal, arbitrary and violation of provisions of Section 5 of the Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 and consequently to set aside the same to the extent of posting the 5th respondent as Depot Manager of APSBCL, Samalkota……”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, subsequent to the filing of the present Writ Petition, the petitioner was promoted and transferred to another place. He further submits that in view of the subsequent developments, the petitioner no longer has any surviving grievance, and the Writ Petition has consequently become infructuous.
3. Recording the said submission, this Court is of the view that no further orders are required to be passed in the matter.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Interim orders, if any, granted earlier shall stand vacated, and all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 06.07.2026 SAK Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/ Reasoned No Reportable No / Non-Reportable Yes
Date: 06.07.2026
SAK