Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/17697/2026 of DESU KRISHNA KUMAR Vs UNION BANK OF INDIA on 5 July 2026
for orders : -- Date of pronouncement : 06.07.2026 Date of uploading : 06.07.2026 APHC010323222026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO:
Date of reserved for orders : --
Date of pronouncement : 06.07.2026
Date of uploading : 06.07.2026
APHC010323222026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 17697/2026
Between:
1. DESU KRISHNA KUMAR, S/O. VENKATA SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC CLERK, RIO. FLAT NO.301, CHANDRAS
LITTLE
ELEPHANT
APARTMENT,
VALLURIVARI THOTA 8TH LINE, DONKA ROAD, GUNTUR -
522002.
2. EMANI SAMBA SIVA RAO, S/O. SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT
57 YEARS, OCC CLERK, RIO. D.NO. 62-13-606, CHENNAM
VANI STREET, OLD GUNTUR, GUNTUR - 522001.
3. KAKUNURI CHENNAKESAVULU,, S/O. VENKATA RATNAM, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC CLERK, RIO. D.NO.1-3-7- 41/1, ANUGOLU VANI STREET, NAZERPETA, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522201.
4. VISHNUMSETTI
APPA
RAO,,
S/O.
SEETHARAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC.CLERK, RIO. D.NO.1-6-41/8, NAZERPET, PURUSHOTHAM VANI STREET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522201.
5. TURAKAPALLI SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O. ANKAMMA, AGED
ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC CLERK, R/O. D.NO.17-180/1, RAMNAGAR, BABA CLINIC ROAD, VETAPALEM, BAPATLA
DISTRICT - 523187.
6. MOKKARALA VENKATESWARLU,, S/O. ANANTHARAMULU, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC. CLERK, RIO. D.NO.8-371, NEAR
BILAL
MASIDH,
PIDUGURALLA,
PALANADU
DISTRICT - 522413.
7. KOLLIMARLA SRI HARI,, S/O. POTHURAJU, AGED ABOUT
56 YEARS, OCC. CLERK, RIO. D.NO.23-9-1/102, BESIDE
VAIKUNTAPURAM,
CHINARAVURU,
TENALI,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT - 522201.
8. RAVULA SADASIVA RAO,, S/O. TIRUPATI SWAMY, AGED
ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC. CLERK, RIO. FLAT NO.102, SRIPADAM APARTMENT, SARAOA COLONY, 8TH LINE, GUNTUR - 522002.
9. POLISETTY JOJAPPA,, S/O. SOWRLU, AGED ABOUT 58
YEARS, OCC. SUB STAFF, R/O. D.NO.12-30, RASULPETA, PHIRANGIPURAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522529..
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. UNION BANK OF INDIA, REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM
MANAGING DIRECTOR UNION BANK OF INDIA, HEAD
OFFICE 239, VIDHAN BHAVAN MARG, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI-400021.
2. THE GENERAL MANAGER HR DEPARTMENT, UNION BANK
OF INDIA, O/O.HEAD OFFICE 239, VIDHAN BHAVAN
MARG, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI- 40021
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the proceedings issued by the respondents vide HR EBD No.423/2026
dated 13.04.2026, 17.06.2026, and 20.04.2026, rejecting the claim of the petitioners for counting their temporary/panel sub-staff service from the date of initial appointment till regularization as qualifying service for pensionery and retirement benefits, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the earlier orders passed by this Hon'ble Court, and violative of Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution of India consequently to set aside the said proceedings and directing the respondents to count the service of the petitioners from the date of their initial appointment as Panel Sub-Staff/temporary employees till regularization as qualifying service for the purpose of pension, gratuity, and all retirement benefits and pass such other orders.
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to count the service of the petitioners from the date of their initial appointment as Panel Sub-Staff/temporary employees till regularization as qualifying service for the purpose of pension, gratuity, and all retirement benefits forthwith and pass such other orders.
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. Dr CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
The Court made the following:
Whether the order is :
Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No
Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
WRIT PETITION No.17697 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of Respondent No.2 in passing the impugned order vide HR EBD No.423/2026, dated 13.04.2026, 17.06.2026 and 20.04.2026 rejecting the claim of the Petitioners for counting their past temporary service for the purpose of pension, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. The brief facts are as follows;
The Petitioners claimed to have joined in the service of Respondent-Bank as mentioned in the below table and they are claiming for counting their past service for the purpose of pension. S.No. Date of joining in the service Date of regularized of the service Date of retirement from the services
05.05.1987 15.02.2008 31.03.2029
10.09.1986 13.03.2009 13.09.2028
31.07.1984 12.11.2001 30.06.2026
31.10.1990 13.03.2009 31.07.2032
19.08.1985 20.03.2009 30.06.2026
01.03.1987 17.03.2010 31.05.2028
06.12.1990 13.03.2009 31.03.2032
01.10.1990 13.03.2009 31.03.2032
15.08.1998 15.02.2008 30.08.2030
3. At the time of hearing, Dr. Challa Srinivasa Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that this Court in W.P.No.18793 of 2020 had considered the similar claim of fellow employees who sought for counting of their past service for the purpose of pension. The said Writ Petition was disposed of on 18.04.2023 directing the Respondents therein to include the temporary service of the Petitioners prior to their absorption into service for the purpose of pensionary benefits. The Writ Appeal thereon filed by Respondent-Bank as dismissed.
4. On the other hand, Sri K. Lakshmi Narasimha, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondent-Bank would submit that the issue of entitlement of counting past service for the purpose of pension is not in dispute in view of the Judgment of this Court W.P.No.18793 of 2020, dated 18.04.2023. However, the learned Standing Counsel would submit that the Respondent-Bank does not have the joining details of the Petitioners. The learned Standing Counsel further submits that if the Petitioners produce requisite proof of appointment date and salary slips for the relevant period, the Respondent-Bank would consider the same without raising the dispute with regard to their entitlement.
5. Having heard the respective counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions;
(i) The Petitioners are directed to give their comprehensive individual representations to the Respondent-Bank with regard to their claim and proof of appointment and the period of work in the Respondent-Bank;
(ii) In the event, there is satisfactory proof of appointment of Petitioner, the Respondent-Bank shall count the temporary service of the Petitioners prior to their absorption for the purpose of pension and for gratuity in terms of the order of this Court in W.P.No.18793 of 2020, dated 18.04.2023;
(iii) No order as to costs.
6. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
Date: 06.07.2026
IS
WRIT PETITION No.17697 of 2026 Dated: 06.07.2026
IS