Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP(PIL)/140/2026 of DANDE GANGA SEKHAR Vs THE STATE OF AP on 5 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WP(PIL) NO: 140 of 2026 Bench Sr.No:-2 [3584] Dande Ganga Sekhar ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. P. Sravan Kumar Reddy Advocates for Respondents : GP for Higher Education

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

APHC010265542026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

WP(PIL) NO: 140 of 2026 Bench Sr.No:-2

Dande Ganga Sekhar ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. P. Sravan Kumar Reddy Advocates for Respondents : GP for Higher Education – R1 & R2 GP for Revenue – R3 to R5, R9 & R10 Mr. B. Abhay Siddhanth Mootha – R11 & R12 GP for Municipal Administration and Urban Development – R6

CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 6th July 2026 P C :

Allegation raised in this writ petition, filed statedly in public interest, is that official respondents are not taking action against illegal sale and purchase of land as is described in writ petition, carried out by unofficial respondents. Such sale is stated to be illegal and violative of provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Education Act, 1982; the Societies Registration Act, 1860; the A.P. Societies Registration Act, 2001; the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988; and the Registration Act, 1908.

2. Keeping in view the nature of averments in writ petition, it is considered appropriate at this stage to direct respondent No.3 to look into allegations at the first instance and, if necessary, place this matter before respondent No.2 for appropriate action.

3. Matter be considered by authorities after affording an opportunity of hearing to all concerned stakeholders as well as petitioner. A decision be taken by way of speaking order to be passed expeditiously and definitely within a period of three (3) months. It is clarified that there is no expression of opinion on merits of the matter.

4. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

LISA GILL, CJ

CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J Whether the order is Speaking

: Yes Whether the order is Reportable : Yes / No kbs

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN

W.P.(PIL) No.140 of 2026

Dt: 06.07.2026

kbs

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead