Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1605/2025 of Appalasetty Tatababu, Vs Sri. Ch. Dwaraka Tirumala Rao - IPS on 5 July 2026
reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 06.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010326362025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 6 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE N Between: 1.
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement : 0
Date of uploading :
APHC010326362025
IN THE H
(
MONDA
THE HONOURAB
THE HONOUR
CONTE
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. APPALASETTY TATA YEARS, OCC- COND A.P.S.R.TC., R/o.H.N MANDAL, MANYAM D
1. SRI CH.DWARAKA T MANAGING DIRECT TRANSPORT CORPO STATION, VIJAYAWA
2. SRI TATANALA V TRANSPORT OFFIC VIZIANAGARAM DIST
3. SMT.ELETI SATYA A.P.S.R.TC. PARVAT
06.07.2026 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) AY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURY RABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR EMPT CASE No: 1605 of 2025 ABABU, S/o.LATE GOPALAM, AGED A DUCTOR, O/o. THE PARVATHIPURAM No.#3-103, PARVATHIPURAM VILLA DISTRICT. ...PE AND TIRUMALA RAO IPS, VICE CHAIRM TOR OF ANDHRA PRADESH, STAT ORATION (A.P.S.R.TC.), PANDIT NE ADA, N.T.R. DISTRICT. VENKATESWARA RAO, DISTRICT CER, APSRTC, PARVATHIPURAM TRICT. A KANAKA DURGA, DEPOT M THIPURAM DEPOT, VIZIANAGARAM D ...CONTE
YA ABOUT 58 M DEPOT, AGE AND TITIONER MAN AND TE ROAD HRU BUS PUBLIC DEPOT, MANAGER, DISTRICT. MNOR(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. Mr.PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. Mr.K SRINIVASA PRASAD, SC For APSRTC
The Court made the following order:
The present Contempt Case is filed alleging violation of the orders dated 29.10.2024 passed in W.A.No.884 of 2024 wherein one of us (TCD,J) is a Member.
2. Learned Division Bench vide said order, directed the Respondent- Employer to consider the Writ Petition as representation and consider and dispose it, strictly in accordance with Law, within an outer limit of six months from the date of receipt of copy of the order.
3. At the time of considering the matter, it is stated that the grievance of the petitioner ventilated in writ petition which is directed to be treated as representation was considered and rejected vide proceedings dated 30.11.2024. A copy of the said proceedings is filed along with the material papers annexed to the counter-affidavit of respondent No.3.
4. In the aforesaid stated position, nothing survives for adjudication in the Contempt Case. Accordingly, the same is closed. However, the petitioner may avail the remedies available in Law against the proceedings dated 30.11.2024, if he is so advised. No costs. No order as to costs. Consequently, all pending applications shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
_____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date: 06.07.2026 BLV
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
C.C.No.1605 of 2025 Dt: 06.07.2026
BLV