Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/1289/2012 of KUNCHA GAJULA BHASKAR Vs KUNCHA GAJULA SAROJA @ SAROJAMMA on 5 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3603] MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1289/2012 Between: 1. KUNCHA GAJULA BHASKAR, S/O RAMANJULU
APHC010718042012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1289/2012
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. KUNCHA GAJULA BHASKAR, S/O RAMANJULU UNEMPLOYED C/O A.VENKATRAMANA NAKKALADINNI, MADANAPALLY TOWN,
...APPELLANT AND
1. KUNCHA GAJULA SAROJA SAROJAMMA, W/o Bhaskar C/o G.Munuswamy Katta Kindapalyam, Punganoor Town,
...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2007 (CMAMP 350 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 79 days in representing the CMASR.NO.47636/06 IA NO: 2 OF 2007 (CMAMP 351 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 9 days in preferring the Appeal before this Hon'ble Court
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. N ASHOK KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent:
1. The Court made the following:
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh) The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed aggrieved by the order passed in O.P.No.6/2005 dated 11.7.2006 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Punganoor. On 22.6.2026 this Court ordered that on the earlier date of adjournment, no representation on behalf of appellant and posted to 22.6.2026. On 22.6.2026 also no representation and posted to today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today also no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence the C.M.A. is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
__________________________ JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR 06.7.2026 RD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.1289 of 2012 06.7.2026 RD