Andhra Pradesh High Court
FCA/279/2009 of Garikapati Rama Brahmam Vs Garikapati Dhana Lakshmi on 5 July 2026
for judgment : Date of Pronouncement : 06.07.2026 Date of Upload : 07.07.2026 APHC010058122009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM FAMILY COURT APPEAL
Date of reserved for judgment :
Date of Pronouncement : 06.07.2026
Date of Upload
: 07.07.2026
APHC010058122009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Garikapati Rama Brahmam, S/o. Venkatapati Rama Brahmam Pensioner R/o. Bapaiah Nagar, Amudalapalli Village, Nizamapatnam Manal, ...Petitioner AND
1. Garikapati Dhana Lakshmi, W/o. Rama Brahmam R/o. Banjara Naik Colony, Syamala Nagar Extn. Guntur Guntur District.
2. Garikapati Vijayalakshmi Naga Malleswari, D/o. Rama Brahmam R/o. Banjara Naik Colony, Syamala Nagar Extn. Guntur, Guntur District. ...Respondents Appeal under section________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2009(FCAMP 562 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in MOP.No. 294/2008 on the file of the Hon'ble Family court, Guntur District
Counsel for the Petitioner: S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY Counsel for the Respondents: M SUBBA REDDY The Court made the following order:
&
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) Sri D. Anil Kumar, learned counsel, representing Sri S. Satyanarayana Moorthy, learned counsel for the appellant on record, represents that in view of the subsequent developments happened during the pendency of this appeal, this appeal has become infructuous.
The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
_________________________ JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM Dated: 06.07.2026 PGR
Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
&
Dt. 06.07.2026
PGR