Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/18829/2012 of Sri K.Venkata Ramana, Vs The APSRTC., on 5 July 2026
for orders : ------------ Date of pronouncement : 06-07-2026 Date of uploading : 15-07-2026 APHC010575822012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT
Date of reserved for orders : ------------ Date of pronouncement : 06-07-2026
Date of uploading : 15-07-2026
APHC010575822012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 18829/2012
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SRI K.VENKATA RAMANA,, S/O LATE K.KRISHNA MURTHY, E.44396 DRIVER, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O H.NO.20-7-16, LAMBADI DONKA, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE APSRTC, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD.
2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, APSRTC., PRAKASAM REGION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DIST.
3. THE DEPOT MANAGER, APSRTC., KANIGIRI DEPOT, KANIGIRI, PRAKASAM DIST.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not providing the Additional Monetary Benefits to the petitioner as per Circular No.111/1985 dt.13-09-1985 issued by the respondent Corporation, as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and against the principles of Natural Justice and violative to Art.14, 16 and 21 of the
Constitution of India, consequently direct the respondents to provide the Additional Monetary Benefits with interest in lieu of employment under Bread Winner Scheme to the petitioner herein, IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 24124 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dt.23- 01-2012 for providing Additional Monetary Benefits in lieu of employment with interest from the date of death of the petitioner's father i.e., 15-02-1998, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S A K MYNUDDIN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC)
The Court made the following Order:
No representation for the petitioner.
2. As per the orders of this court dated 22.06.2026 as there is no alternative arrangement made by the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed for default. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
06.07.2026 NNN
Whether the order is : Speaking ☑ Reasoned
Reportable Non-reportable ☑