WP/11699/2006 of N. RUTH ROSALIND, W.G.DISTRICT. Vs THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, BHEEMAVARAM, W.G.DIST AND 5 on 5 July 2026

1. N. RUTH ROSALIND, W.G.DISTRICT., D/O. N.S. MILONGTHON, R/O. D.NO.13-18-15, BATHINIPETA, BHIMAVARAM, W.G.DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER BHEEMAVARAM W G DIST AND 5, BHEEMAVARAM, W.G.DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, W.G.DISTRICT AT ELURU.

3. THE COMMISSIONER 7 DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD.

4. S T K S E S K AYYANAGAR, A.R.K.R.MPL. HIGH SCHOOL, SECONDARY GRADE TEACHER, BHEEMAVARAM, W.G.DISTRICT.

5. N SUCHITHRA, SECONDARY GRADE TEACHER, PRESENTLY WORKING IN P.S.M. HIGH SCHOOL, BHEEMAVARAM, W.G.DISTRICT,

6. U RAMESH, S.U.S. MPL. HIGH SCHOOL, SCHOOL ASSISTANT ( ENGLISH), BHEEMAVARAM, W.G.DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the natureof writ of Mandamus or any other appropirate writ after calling for the records dt. 17.3.2006 in O.A.No.623/04 with VMA No.41305 and consequently direct the respondents to regularize the services of the Petitioner in the cadre of School Assistant and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2006(WVMP 1238 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim order dt. 7.6.2006 passed in WPMP. 14544 of 2006 in W.P. No.11699 of 2006. IA NO: 2 OF 2006(WPMP 9382 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased dispense with for production of the certified copy of the order made in O.A.No.623/04 with VMA: No.413 of 05 dt. 17.3.2006 for the present and pass suchother or further orders. IA NO: 3 OF 2006(WPMP 14544 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as School Assistant by suspending the orders dated 17.3.2006 in OA.No.623/04 with VMA.No.413/05 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K UDAYA SRI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR EDUCATION

2. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni,Standing Counsel For Municipalities

3. .

4. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following:

ORDER :-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner.

2. The Writ Petition is dismissed ‘for want of prosecution’.

3. The interim order granted by this Court in W.V.M.P.No.1238 of 2006 on 27.09.2006 stands vacated.

No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J

_____________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI, J Date : 06.07.2026. RPD.

Whether the order is : Speaking ✔ Yes/ No Reasoned ✔ Yes/ No Reportable ✔ Yes/ No Non-Reportable ✔ Yes/ No

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI

(DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION)

WRIT PETITION NO: 11699 of 2006

Date: 06.07.2026

RPD.