Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/17812/2026 of Chowdagani Pedda Polaiah Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 5 July 2026
for orders : --- Date of pronouncement : 06.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010332302026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 17812/2026
Date of reserved for orders
: ---
Date of pronouncement
: 06.07.2026
Date of uploading
:
APHC010332302026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 17812/2026
Between:
1. CHOWDAGANI PEDDA POLAIAH, S/O. NARAYANA, AGED
YEARS,
R/O.
D.NO.5/101,
SREERAM
NAGAR,NANDYALAMPETA PANCHAYAT, MYDUKUR
MANDAL,YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY
ITS
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
IRRIGATION
AND
COMMAND
AREA
DEVELOPMENT
(WATER
RESOURCES)
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
2. 2 THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER NTR TELUGU
GANGA PROJECT CIRCLE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT
KADAPA 3 THE, NTR TELUGU GANGA PROJECT
CIRCLE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTORCUMCHAIRMAN, DISTRICT
SELECTION COMMITTEE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA.
4. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR L A, TELUGU
GANGA PROJECT UNIT-1, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA
DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondents in not considering the case of petitioner for appointment in a suitable post as per his qualification in terms of G.O.Ms.No.98 Irrigation and CAD (PW) Department dated 15.04.1986, in terms of order of the Honble Court in W.P. No.13543 of 2019 dated 01.02.2022
as affirmed in W.A. No.356 of 2023, dated 17.11.2025, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and Consequently, direct the respondents herein to consider the case of petitioner for appointment in a suitable post as per his qualification in terms of G.O.Ms.No.98 Irrigation and CAD (PW) Department dated 15.04.1986 and in terms of order of the Honble Court in W.P. No.13543 of 2019 dated 01.02.2022 as affirmed in W.A. No.356 of 2023, dated 17.11.2025 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct Respondent Nos.2 & 3, to consider the representation of petitioner dated 26.03.2026 for appointment in a suitable post as per his qualification in terms of G.O.Ms.No.98 Irrigation & CAD
(PW) Department dated 15.04.1986, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. OMKAR D
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES II
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
W.P.No.17812 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the inaction of the Respondents in not providing employment to the Petitioner in terms of G.O.Ms.No.98, Irrigation (PROJ. WING) Department, dated 15.04.1986, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. The lands of the parents of the Petitioner were acquired at Jangamrajupalle Village of B. Mattam Mandal, for the purpose of the Telugu Ganga Project in the year-1984. As per G.O.Ms.No.98, Irrigation (PROJ. WING) Department, dated 15.04.1986, employment was to be offered to the members of the displaced families or their dependents. The Petitioner, being the dependent of the original landowner, applied for employment in terms of the said G.O. However, though his name was reflected in the shortlisted eligible persons, his case was not considered for employment. Hence, this Writ Petition is filed.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner relies on the judgment of this Court in W.P.No.40372 of 2018 and batch, and
W.P.No.3445 of 2020, wherein employment was directed to be offered to the dependents of the landowners therein, and seeks similar relief in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the land acquisition took place in 1984 and, despite the lapse of more than 40 years, employment has still not been provided.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that case of the Petitioner will be considered and necessary action will be initiated for providing employment in terms of G.O.Ms.No.98 dated 15.04.1986, as per the rules in force.
5. Considering the fact that the lands of the Petitioner were acquired way back in 1984, the delay in providing employment cannot be justified; more so, as the employment was to be treated as part of the promised compensation.
6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the Respondents to consider the case of the Petitioner for employment on par with similarly placed persons, as expeditiously as possible. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 06.07.2026 chs
Whether the order is: Speaking ✔ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ✔
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO:17812/2026 Dt. 06.07.2026
chs