Andhra Pradesh High Court
FCA/305/2009 of BOJJA SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Vs BOJJA RATNA KUMARI on 5 July 2026
for judgment : Date of Pronouncement : 06.07.2026 Date of Upload : 07.07.2026 APHC010258412009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM FAMILY COURT APPEAL
Date of reserved for judgment :
Date of Pronouncement : 06.07.2026
Date of Upload
: 07.07.2026
APHC010258412009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. BOJJA SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, S/o. Jagannadham Administrative Officer LIC of India, S. Kota Branch, S. Kota, Vizianagaram District. ...Petitioner AND
1. BOJJA RATNA KUMARI, W/o. Satyanarayana Murthy House wife R/o.Q.No.104-A, Sector-IV, Ukkunagaram, Visakhapatnam. ...Respondent Appeal under section________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2009(FCAMP 596 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of (28) days in filing the above FCA before this Hon'ble Court against the decree & order passed in OPNo.1235 of 2008 on the file of the Court of Judge, Addl. Family Court, Visakhapatnam dt. 19.08.2009 IA NO: 2 OF 2009(FCAMP 603 OF 2009
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the decree and order passed in OP No.1235/2008 on the file of the court of Judge, Addl.Family Court, Visakhapatnam dated 19.08.2009 pending disposal of the above FCA Counsel for the Petitioner: T S ANIRUDH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent N ANULA The Court made the following order:
&
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) On 31.12.2025, there is no representation for the appellant. Accordingly, it is posted to 21.01.2026 under the caption “for dismissal”. On 22.06.2026 also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Again it was posted under the same caption “for dismissal” after two weeks. Even today also, there is no representation for the appellant.
Learned counsel for the respondent present.
This appeal pertaining to the year 2009. It appears, the appellant has no interest to prosecute the case.
In view of the same, this appeal is dismissed as non-prosecution.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
_________________________ JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM Dated: 06.07.2026 PGR
Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
&
Dt. 06.07.2026
PGR