Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/12859/2023 of Yedlapalli Adinarayana Murthy Vs .The State of Andhra Pradesh on 5 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

for orders : Date of pronouncement : 06.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010244272023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 12859/2023

Date of reserved for orders :

Date of pronouncement : 06.07.2026

Date of uploading

:

APHC010244272023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

Between:

1. YEDLAPALLI ADINARAYANA MURTHY, S/O.CHINA KONDALA RAO

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC: PROHIBITION AND EXCISE

SUPERINTENDENT SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, SRIKAKULAM, A.P.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF

SECRETARY

REVENUE

(EXCISE)

DEPARTMENT

A.P.

SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION AND EXCISE, ANDHRA

PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA

3. THE

A

P

STATE

BEVERAGES

CORPORATION

LIMITED

PROHIBITION

AND

EXCISE

COMPLEX,

R.S.NO.88-2B

PRASADAMPADU, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT REP.BY ITS

MANAGING DIRECTOR.

4. S SANKARAIAH, S/O AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER

OCC. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION AND EXCISE

(VIGILANCE)

AND

DEPOT

MANAGER

(FAC),

IMFL

DEPOT,

SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing Meme No.REV01-CPEOMISC/403/2022- Excise dated 19-04-2023 wherein directed. the 2nd respondent not to post the petitioner as Depot Manager, APSBCL ignoring the earlier Memo No.REV01-CPEOMISC/403/2022-Excise dt.04-04-2023 wherein posted him as District Prohibition and Excise Officer/Depot Manager, APSBCL, Srikakulam in the vacancy arised due to VRS of Ch.Dasu, District Prohibition and Excise Superintendent/Depot Manager, IMFL Depot, Srikakulam is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, discriminatory, violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India and contraIy to GO Ms No. 343

Revenue (Excise) Department dated 12-11-2020 and consequently set aside the memo dated 19-04-2023 of the 1St respondent in so far as posting the petitioner except as Depot Manager, APSBCL, Srikakulam by directing the respondents to implement the earlier orders dated 04-04-2023 in toto issued in Memo No. REV01-CPEOMISC/403/2022-Excise of the 1st respondent, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to issue posting orders of Depot Manager, APSBCL, Srikakulam, in favour of the petitioner, enabling him to discharge his duties along with DPEO, Srikakulam, by suspending the Memo No.REV01-CPEO

MISC/403/2022-Excise Dt.19-04-2023 of the 1st respondent in so far as posting the petitioner except as Depot Manager, APSBCL, Srikakulam, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. KAVITHA GOTTIPATI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. DEVARAKONDA VENKATAIAH

2. GP FOR SERVICES I

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the action of respondent No.1 in issuing Memo No.REV01-CPEOMISC/403/2022-Excise, dated 19.04.2023, whereby respondent No.2 was directed not to post the petitioner as Depot Manager, APSBCL, notwithstanding the earlier Memo No.REV01-CPEOMISC/403/2022-Excise, dated 04.04.2023, under which the petitioner had been posted as District Prohibition and Excise Officer/Depot Manager, APSBCL, Srikakulam, against the vacancy that arose on account of the voluntary retirement (VRS) of Sri Ch. Dasu, District Prohibition and Excise Superintendent/Depot Manager, IMFL Depot, Srikakulam.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, subsequent to the filing of the present Writ Petition, the petitioner has retired from service. It is further submitted that, in view of the said subsequent development, the grievance raised in the Writ Petition no longer survives for adjudication.

3. Recording the said submission, this Court is of the view that no further orders are required to be passed in the matter.

4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

Interim orders, if any, granted earlier shall stand vacated, and all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 06.07.2026 SAK Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/ Reasoned No Reportable No / Non-Reportable Yes

Date: 06.07.2026

SAK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead