WP/660/2025 of Sudhir Kumar Hasija Vs The Reserve Bank of India, on 5 July 2026

1. SUDHIR KUMAR HASIJA, S/O GIAN CHAND HASIJA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/O 39/13, APPAREDDY PALAYA, MAIN ROAD, OFF 7TH MAIN HAL 2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560038.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS MANAGER, 6-1-56, SECRETARIAT ROAD, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD, TALANGANA.

2. THE UNION BANK OF INDIA, (FORMERLY ANDHRA BANK), REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, HINDUPUR BRANCH, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.

3. TRANS UNION CIBIL LIMITED, (FORMERLY CREDIT INFORMATION BUREAU (INDIA) LIMITED), ONE WORLD CENTRE, TOWER 2A, 19TH FLOOR, SENAPATI BAPAT MARG, ELPHINSTONE ROAD, MUMBAI - 400 013.

4. M/S KALPATARU STEEL ROLLING MILLS LIMITED, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, OFFICE AT 121, FIRST FLOOR, VARDHAMAN MARKET, OUTER RING ROAD, VIKASPURI, NEW DELHI. FACTORY AT PLOT NO. 55 AND 56, API 1C GROWTH CENTRE, THUMAKUNYA, HINDUPUR-515201.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ order or orders especially in the form of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of 2nd respondent/Bank in submitting a report to the 3rd respondent showing the petitioner in defaulters list as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of articles 14, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent/ bank to remove the name of the petitioner from the defaulters list and submit a report afresh to the 3rd respondent and upon the same, the 3rd respondent may be directed to remove the name of the petitioner from the defaulters list and further direct the 2nd respondent to initiate necessary penal action against the persons submitted false and forged documents showing the petitioner as Director of the 4th respondent IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to forthwith initiate necessary steps for removing the name of the petitioner from the defaulters list to be communicated to R3 IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the company master data of the 4th respondent dated 22/02/2019 and declare the petitioners as not the director of the 4th respondent Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K S MURTHY ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. SRIDEVI GANTA

2. V DYUMANI

3. The Court made the following order:

Sri K.Guru Raja, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, pursuant to filing of this writ petition, the authorities have removed the petitioner’s names from the defaulters list and the writ petition became infructuous and hence prayed to dismiss the writ petition.

2. Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 06.07.2026 BRS

Whether the order is :

Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No