Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/17764/2026 of SV Agro Foods Products Vs Assistant Commissioner (S.T.) on 5 July 2026
for orders : nil Date of pronouncement : 06.07.2026 Date of uploading : 15.07.2026 APHC010328482026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3543] MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI
Date of reserved for orders : nil
Date of pronouncement : 06.07.2026
Date of uploading : 15.07.2026
APHC010328482026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
WRIT PETITION NO: 17764/2026
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SV AGRO FOODS PRODUCTS, 44-A/2, NELLATUR VILLAGE, GUDUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE, ANDHRA PRADESH - 524103. REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, SRI G.SANDEEP KUMAR
...PETITIONER AND
1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER S T, GUDUR CIRCLE, GUDUR - 524
101.
2. JOINT COMMISSIONER STATE TAX, NELLORE DIVISION, NELLORE - 524 001.
3. DEPUTY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER S T, GUDUR - CIRCLE, GUDUR - 524101
4. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER S T, APPELLATE AUTHORITY, THUNGA RESIDENCY,
FLAT NO.101, RENIGUNTA ROAD, TIRUPATHI - 517 501. CHITTOOR DISTRICT
5. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, COMMERCIAL TAXES, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522 237.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or Order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus setting aside the impugned Order in Appeal passed by the fourth respondent in Form GST APL - 04, dated 10.02.2026, vide CTD Order No.DIN3709022687639 (ZD37022601 1 658C), passed for the tax period January 2019 to February 2020, in subjecting the mixed vegetable cut mango lime and raw / unripe mango cut into pieces as classifiable under HSN Code 0812, taxable @5 percent rejecting the same as being classifiable under HSN Code 0711, exempt from the levy of tax, as illegal, arbitrary contrary to Notification No.2 of 2017 dated 28.06.2017 and contrary to the provisions of the CGST Act, 2017 / APGST Act, 2017, or to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to pending disposal of the Writ Petition stay of all further proceedings arising in pursuance of the Order in Appeal passed by the fourth respondent in Form GST APL - 04, dated 10.02.2026, vide CTD Order No.DIN3709022687639 (ZD370226011658O), passed for the tax period January 2019 to February 2020, or to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S SURI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
2. The Court made the following:
WRIT PETITION NO: 17764 of 2026
ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ninala Jayasurya)
The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in business of vegetables, fruits, nuts and edible oil, etc., is an assessee on the rolls of the 1st respondent with GSTIN bearing No.37ACOFSO859FIZQ, and submitting GSTR – 3B and GSTR – 1 Returns regularly and paying taxes thereon.
2. Pursuant to an inspection conducted by the 1st respondent on 09.12.2020, an intimation of tax in Form GST 01A dated 21.09.2021 was issued to the petitioner. Objections dated 25.10.2021 were filed and thereafter, an assessment order in Form GST DRC – 07 dated 06.12.2021 under Section 74 of CGST Act, 2017 for the period of January, 2019 to February, 2020 was passed. Aggrieved by the said order, petitioner filed appeal before the 4th respondent, who in turn vide proceedings dated 10.02.2026 modified the assessment order.
3. Though further appeal lies before the GSTAT, A.P. in terms of Section 112 of GST Act, on the premise that the Tribunal was not constituted, the present writ petition is filed.
4. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of various contentions raised in the writ petition, the same is liable to be allowed, keeping in view the undisputed statutory realm, we deem it appropriate to relegate the petitioner to the statutory remedy of appeal.
5. In the aforesaid view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the statutory remedies, within a period of six (6) weeks, from today.
6. Needless to say, the period from the date of passing of the impugned order till the date of receipt of this order shall be excluded for the purpose of limitation.
7. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J
_______________ T.C.D.SEKHAR, J
GVK Whether the order is :
Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION No.17764 of 2026
Dt. 06.07.2026
GVK