Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/11424/2026 of AI ARSH ENTERPRISES PVT LTD Vs ACHARYA N G RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY on 5 July 2026
for orders : --------------- Date of pronouncement : 06.07.2026 Date of uploading : 13.07.2026 APHC010220892026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT
Date of reserved for orders : --------------- Date of pronouncement : 06.07.2026
Date of uploading : 13.07.2026
APHC010220892026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 11424/2026
Between:
1. AI ARSH ENTERPRISES PVT LTD, OUTSOURCING MANPOWER
SERVICES CORPORATE HEAD OFFICE FIRST FLOOR, 19-3-247, OLD TOWN, BHAVANI NAGAR, ANANTAPUR, A.P - 515001 REP. BY
ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
...PETITIONER
AND
1. ACHARYA N G RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, REP. BY ITS
REGISTRAR, GUNTUR, A.P. S THE DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH, ANGRAU, GUNTUR.
2. THE
ASSOCIATE
DIRECTOR
OF
RESEARCH,
REGIONAL
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH STATION, ANAKAPALLE, ANAKAPALLE
DISTRICT.
3. THE
ASSOCIATE
DIRECTOR
OF
RESEARCH,
REGIONAL
AGRICULTURAL
RESEARCH
STATION,
NANDYAL,
NANDYAL
DISTRICT,
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents restricting the contract period to six months, contrary to Circular Memo dated 24.03.2026 and G.O.Rt.No.4271 dated 01.11.2008, in illegal, arbitrary.as discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents to grant/extend the contract period to one year and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased leased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner's Contract for a period of one year, in terms of Circular Memo dated 24.03.2026 and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P SHASHI VARDHAN
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. S PRANATHI
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
The grievance of the petitioner in the instant writ petition is against the action of the respondents in restricting the contract period to six (6) months, contrary to Circular Memo dated 24.03.2026 and G.O.Rt.No.4271 dated 01.11.2008.
2. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that after filing of the writ petition, the respondents have extended the contract period for another six (6) months. Thus, he submits that no further orders are required to be passed.
3. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
________________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 06.07.2026 ANI
Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned
Reportable Non-reportable ☑
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO:11424 of 2026
Dated: 06.07.2026
ANI