Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/3288/2025 of VATTEM SRINIVASA RAO Vs PEEYUSH KUMAR, IAS on 2 July 2026
for orders : Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026 Date of uploading : 08.07.2026 APHC010592062025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3288/2025
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026
Date of uploading : 08.07.2026
APHC010592062025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3288/2025
Between:
1. VATTEM SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47
YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/O. 36-85, PURUSHOTHAMA
PATNAM, CHILAKALURIPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETAIY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
(R-2)
2. SRI P SRIHARI BABU, COMMISSIONER, CHILAKALURIPET
MUNICIPALITY CHILAKALURIPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. (R-4)
3. SRI GAUTAM ALLADA IA AND AS, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AP
CFMS OFFICE, 6TH FLOOR, C-BLOCK, ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. (R-7)
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Please to direct notices to the Respondents herein and punish them for contempt of courts of the Honble High court for deliberate,intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Honble Court dated 14.08.2025
passed in WP No. 15712 of 2024 under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MODAPOTHULA SUMALATHA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI
2. .
3. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:-
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.15712 of 2024, dated 14.08.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
03.07.2026 PNS
Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ☑