Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/37103/2022 of Bathula Gangulappa Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 2 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010620222022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 37103/2022 Between: 1. BATHULA

Date of reserved for orders :

Date of pronouncement :

Date of uploading :

APHC010620222022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA

PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 37103/2022

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. BATHULA GANGULAPPA, S/O LATE B.NADIPANNA ALIAS VENKATASWAMY AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O.5-8, VENKATADRI COLONY, BHIMAGANIPALLI POST,

PUNGANUR MANDAL-517247, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAMANER REVENUE DIVISION PALAMANER-5174O8, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P.

4. THE TAHSILDAR, PUNGANUR MANDAL CHITTOOR

DISTRICT, A.P.

5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR-517002.

6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PUNGANUR POLICE STATION PUNGANUR-517247, CHITTOOR DIST. A.P. THE WRIT PETITION IS DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED WITH RESPECT TO RESPONDENTS 5 AND 6 AS PER CO DT 28/11/2022

7. D L SATYANARAYANA, S/O LAXMAIAH AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/O.12 154, NEAR B.R. PICTURE PALACE, PALAMANER ROAD, PUNGANUR TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

8. DIALITHAMMA, D/O VENKATASWAMY AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O.12-154, NEAR B.R.PICTURE PALACE, PALAMANER ROAD, PUNGANUR TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

9. P ANJAMMA, W/O M.RAVI, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O.KAMATHAMPALLI VILLAGE, BHEEMAGANI PALLI POST, PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Revenue authorities in particular, the 4th Respondent, in mutating and issuing Pattadar Pass and Title Deed on the names of the third parties/unofficial respondents for the land in Sy.No.4o8/13, an extent of Ac.o.67 cents of Bhimaganipalli Village, Punganur Mandal, Chittoor District, which belongs to the writ petitioner, without any notice to the writ petitioner and without following the due process of law and also in violation of the principles of natural justice as laid down under the A.P. Assignment Laws, or under the ROR Act, 1971, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently set-aside the said mutation and issuance of Pass Books and Title Deeds on the name of third parties/unofficial respondents and thereafter direct the Revenue authorities to mutate the name of the writ petitioner and also direct the Revenue authorities to issue Pattadar Pass Book and Title Deed to the writ petitioner for the land in Sy.No.408/13, an extent of Ac.o.67 cents of Bhimaganipalli Village, Punganur Mandal, Chittoor District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents, not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land in Sy.No.4o8/13, an extent of Ac.o.67 cents of Bhimaganipalli Village, Punganur Mandal, Chittoor District of the petitioner, pending disposal of the main writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. S S BHATT Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. S PARINEETA

2. GP FOR HOME

3. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.37103 of 2022 O R DE R: Learned counsel for the Petitioner filed letter dated 01.07.2026 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail the alternative remedies.

2. Permission as sought for is accorded.

3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue the alternative remedies. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed. ___________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 03.07.2026 KLP Whether the order is: Speaking

Reasoned

Reportable

Non-reportable

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead