Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/4175/2025 of MS GSK Estructural India Pvt.Ltd Vs Sri Peeyush Kumar IAS on 2 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

for orders : Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026 Date of uploading : 08.07.2026 APHC010696522025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4175/2025

Date of reserved for orders :

Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026

Date of uploading : 08.07.2026

APHC010696522025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4175/2025

Between:

1. MS

GSK

ESTRUCTURAL

INDIA

PVT.LTD,

REPT.

BY

ITS

PROPRIETOR G. ANIL KUMAR, S/O RAM MOHAN RAO, AGED

ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCCU CONTRACTOR, FLAT NO 304, SAI

BALARAM RESIDENCY, SR NAGAR COLONY, BENZ CIRCLE, JYOTHI MAHAL BACKSIDE, VIJAYAWADA URBAN, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT

BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. (R-2)

2. SRI DHYANACHANDRA H M IAS, WORKING AS COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAWADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR

DISTRICT. (R-3)

3. SMT G SAMRAJYAM, WORKING AS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER-ILL

O/O MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA. VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. (R-4)

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may

be pleased to pleased to summon the respondents herein, and punish them for willful, deliberate disobedience of the orders passed by this Honble court in W.P.No.23993 of 2025, dt.09.09.2025, under section 10 to 12 of the Contemptof Courts Act, 1971, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. GNANESWARA RAO MITTIREDDI

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI

2. KOTHARU VIJAYESWARI

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order:-

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.23993 of 2025, dated 09.09.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.

2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N

03.07.2026 PNS

Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned

Reportable

Non-reportable ☑

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead