Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/2280/2022 of N.SHILPA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 2 July 2026
for orders : --- Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010032412022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 2280/2022
Date of reserved for orders
: ---
Date of pronouncement
: 03.07.2026
Date of uploading
:
APHC010032412022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 2280/2022
Between:
1. N.SHILPA, W/O HARINATHA RAJU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 41
YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O BALAGANGANAPALLE VILLAGE
AND POST, G.D. NELLORE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
REVENUE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT
BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE
DISTRICT
COLLECTOR,
,
CHITTOOR,
CHITTOOR
DISTRICT.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR
DISTRICT.
4. THE
TAHSILDAR,
GANGADHARA
NELLORE
MANDAL,
CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
5. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, BALAGANGANAPALLE, H/O
VINZAM,
GANGADHARA
NELLORE
MANDAL,
CHITTOOR
DISTRICT.
6. N S YUVARAJA REDDY, SIO SIDDA REDDY, HINDU, AGED
ABOUT 53 YEARS, TEACHER, R/O NAGUMPALLI VILLAGE, GANGADHARA NELLORE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
7. B CHENNAKESAVA REDDY, , S/O MUNI REDDY, HINDU, AGED
ABOUT 49 YEARS, TEACHER, R/O BALAGANGANAPALLE
VILLAGE, GANGADHARA NELLORE MANDAL, CHITTOOR
DISTRICT.
8. THE APPASAMUNDRAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS
SECRETARY, UDAYAGIRI MANDAL, S.P.S.R.NELLORE
DISTRCT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the inaction on the part of the Respondents herein not releasing the first and final bill amount worth of Rs.41,82,432 Rupees Forty One lakhs Eighty two thousand Four hundred and Thirty two only) with interest under M.G.N.R.E.G.S.The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme Convergence Funds to the Petitioner till today after completion of execution of work for the purpose of material supplied by the Petitioner for laying the formation of Approach road with gravel surface from Appasamundram to Masidpalli in Appasamundram GP
Grama Panchayat, Udayagiri Mandal, S.P.S.R.Nellore Distrct, causing heavy losses with the interest. Even though, total works are completed within time, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14,16 84 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to release and pay the amount worth of Rs.41,82,432 Rupees Forty One lakhs Eighty two thousand Four hundred and Thirty two only) with interest 12
percent per annum under the M.G.N.R.E.G.S. (The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme) Convergence Funds forthwith to the Petitioner IA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may
be pleased to direct the Respondents 4 and 5 not to interfere with the Petitioner's possession and enjoyment of her property for an extent of Ac.2-00 cents of agriculture land situated in Survey No.1180/1 of Vinzam Village, Gangadhara Nellore Mandal, Chittoor District without following due proces of law Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G RAMACHANDRA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following:
WRIT PETITION No.2280 of 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and it has become infructuous. In that view, no orders are required to be passed.
2. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed, as infructuous.
3. No order as to costs.
4. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
Date: 03.07.2026 chs Whether the order is: Speaking ✔ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ✔
WRIT PETITION No.2280 of 2022 Dated: 03.07.2026
chs