Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/741/2025 of U. RAMANNA Vs CH.D. TIRUMALA RAO on 2 July 2026
for orders : Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026 Date of uploading : 08.07.2026 APHC010122392025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 741/2025
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026
Date of uploading : 08.07.2026
APHC010122392025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 741/2025
Between:
1. U. RAMANNA, S/O. THIMMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC
CONDUCTOR(RETIRED) R/O. H.NO. 17/148-10-1, SANJEEVAIAH
NAGAR, PATTIKONDA, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. CH
D
TIRUMALA
RAO,
VICE-CHAIRMAN,
AND
MANAGING
DIRECTOR A.P.S.R.T.C, RTC HOUSE 3RD FLOOR, VIJAYAWADA.
2. T SRINIVASULU, REGIONAL MANAGER, APS RTC KURNOOL
REGION, KURNOOL DISTRICT
3. V S M D RAFEEQ, DEPOT MANAGER, ADONI KURNOOL DISTRICT.
4. PEEYUSH
KUMAR,
PRINICPAL
SECRETARY
TO
GOVERNMENT,FINANCE
DEPARTMENT,
A.P.SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI, ANDHRA PRADESH-52238 R 4 IS IMPLEADED AS
PER COURT ORDER DATED 31.10.2025,VIDE IA NO-1 OF 2025 IN
CC NO-741 OF 2025.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents for their wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 04-12-2024 Passed in
W.P. No. 26888 of 2013 and punish the respondents under section 10 to 12
of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed respondent Peeyush Kumar, the Principal Secretary of Finance and Planning Department as 4th respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K V RAGHU VEER
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU NAGURU
2. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC)
3.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:-
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.26888 of 2013, dated 04.12.2024 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
03.07.2026 PNS
Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ☑