Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/563/2026 of M.S. INFRA Vs Sri Peeyush Kumar, IAS, on 2 July 2026
for orders : Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010063902026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 563/2026 Between: 1.
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026
Date of uploading :
APHC010063902026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 563/2026
Between:
1. M.S.
INFRA,
D.NO.1-3-549-11,
CHENNA
REDDY
COLONY, PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER MR.D.SRIKANTH
REDDY.
2. D.SRIKANTH REDDY, S/O. D. RAMI REDDY, AGED
ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, M.S.INFRA, D.NO.1-3-549-11, CHENNA
REDDY
COLONY,
PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. SRI
PEEYUSH
KUMAR
IAS,
S/O.
NOT
KNOWN,
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, THE
STATE
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
SECRETARIAT
VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. R SATHISH KUMAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN, ENGINEER IN
CHIEF (ADMN), WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SERVICE
ROAD,
CURRENCY
NAGAR,
TCDS,J
C.C.NO.563 of 2026
RAMAVARAPPADU RING VIJAYAWADA, A.P.
3. M
MALLIKARJUNA
REDDY,
S/O.
NOT
KNOWN,
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, SKD GNSS PROJECT
CIRCLE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
4. M L N VARA PRASAD, S/O.NOT KNOWN, ENGINEER IN
CHIEF(ADMN), WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SERVICE
ROAD,
CURRENCY
NAGAR,
RAMAVARAPPADU RING, VIJAYAWADA, A.P. 520001. R
4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED
24.04.2026, VIDE IA NO-5/2026 IN CC NO-563 OF 2026
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents herein under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberately disobeying the order of this Honble Court passed in W.P.No.25885 of 2024 dated 28.07.2025 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the Respondent No.2
in C.C. No. 563 of 2026 and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the Respondent No.3
in C.C. No. 563 of 2026 and pass
IA NO: 3 OF 2026
TCDS,J
C.C.NO.563 of 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to discharge this Respondent from the present Contempt Case No.563 of 2026 and pass IA NO: 4 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to discharge this Respondent from the present Contempt Case No.563 of 2026 and pass IA NO: 5 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to implead the proposed respondent as respondent No.4 in
CC.No.563 of 2026 against the orders in W.P.No.25885 of 2024
dated 28.07.2025 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K NAVEEN KUMAR
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI
The Court made the following:
TCDS,J
C.C.NO.563 of 2026
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR
CONTEMPT CASE NO.563 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :-
It is represented by the counsel for the respondent, that the order of the Contempt Case is complied with. The said submission is not disputed by the counsel for the petitioner.
2. In the said circumstances, nothing further survives to be adjudicated in the Contempt Case. Accordingly the same is closed. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any shall stand closed. ________________ T.C.D.SEKHAR, J
03.07.2026 CMK
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasonable Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
TCDS,J
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
CONTEMPT CASE. NO.563 of 2026 03.07.2026
CMK