Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/813/2024 of M/s.Siva Sai Constructions, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 2 July 2026
reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading APHC010011062024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 813/2024 Between: 1. M/S.SIVA SAI CONSTRUCTIONS,, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, K.V.SAI PRANEETH REDDY,
Date of reserved for orders
Date of pronouncement
Date of uploading
APHC010011062024
IN TH
FRID
THE HONOURA
W
Between:
1. M/S.SIVA SAI C
PARTNER, K.V.SA
REDDY AGED 39
198,MAIN
ROAD
SAI(ANANTHAPUR
1. THE STATE OF
SECRETARY,
SECRETARIAT BU
2. THE
CHIEF
VIJAYAWADA,KRIS
3. SUPERINTENDING
ANANTAPURAM D
4. THE EXECUTIVE
ANANTHAPURAM
5. THE STATE OF
SECRETARY, s :
: 03.07.2026
: 08.07.2026
E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
DAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL
WRIT PETITION NO: 813/2024
ONSTRUCTIONS,, REP. BY ITS
AI PRANEETH REDDY, S/O.K.V.RA
9 YEARS, OCC- CONTRACTOR,
D,KUTA
GULLA,
KADIRI,S
RAM) DISTRICT.
AND
ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY
ROADS
AND
BUILDINGS
D
ILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVAT
ENGINEER,
RANDB
NH
SHNA DISTRICT.
G ENGINEER, RANDB CIRCLE,AN
ISTRICT.
ENGINEER, RANDB DIVISION,DH
DISTRICT.
ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY
FINANCE
AND
PLANNING
D
RC,J
DESH
LAPATI
S MANAGING
AMACHANDRA
R/O.D.NO.L5-
SRI
SATYA
...PETITIONER
Y PRINCIPAL
DEPARTMENT,
THI.
AND
CRF,
NANTAPURAM,
ARMAVARAM,
Y PRINCIPAL
DEPARTMENT,
RC,J
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondents in withholding the payment an amount of Rs.8,20,10,381/- even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the work i.e Widening and Strengthening of road from Roddam pavagada road to dodagatta state Border road from km 0/0 to 10/0
(Working reach from km 0/0 to 4/500) and Improvements to road from Peddakodipalli to Narnagepalli (Via) R.Locherla Bucheria of Roddam mandal from km 0/0 to even after 14/0 In ATP District (Working reach from 12/0 to 14/0), vide CR agreement No.90/2022-23, dated 31.03.2023 as the same is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider for payment of Rs.8,20,10,381/- with interest @12percent per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of above-mentioned work forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider for payment of final Bill amounts Rs.8,20,10,381/- with interest @12% per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of works i.e Widening and Strengthening of road from Roddam pavagada road to dodagatta state Border road from km 0/0 to 10/0 (Working reach from km 0/0 to 4/500) and Improvements to road from Peddakodipalli to Narnagepalli (Via) R.Locherla Bucheria of Roddam mandal from km 0/0 to 14/0 In ATP District (Working reach from 12/0 to 14/0)”, vide CR agreement No.90/2022-23, dated 31.03.2023 pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS
2.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
RC,J
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent authorities in withholding the payment of amount even after finalizing the bills payable to the petitioner in relation to the works executed by it.
2. Sri C.Praveen, learned Assistant Government Pleader for R&B, submitted that the amount claimed in this writ petition has duly been paid to the petitioner.
3. In view of the submission made by learned Assistant Government Pleader, nothing remains for adjudication in this writ petition and the same can be closed.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. If the petitioner feels that cause in this writ petition still survives, he can make an appropriate application within two (02) months. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 3rd July, 2026 RR Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No