Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/813/2024 of M/s.Siva Sai Constructions, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 2 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading APHC010011062024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 813/2024 Between: 1. M/S.SIVA SAI CONSTRUCTIONS,, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, K.V.SAI PRANEETH REDDY,

Date of reserved for orders

Date of pronouncement

Date of uploading

APHC010011062024

IN TH

FRID

THE HONOURA

W

Between:

1. M/S.SIVA SAI C

PARTNER, K.V.SA

REDDY AGED 39

198,MAIN

ROAD

SAI(ANANTHAPUR

1. THE STATE OF

SECRETARY,

SECRETARIAT BU

2. THE

CHIEF

VIJAYAWADA,KRIS

3. SUPERINTENDING

ANANTAPURAM D

4. THE EXECUTIVE

ANANTHAPURAM

5. THE STATE OF

SECRETARY, s :

: 03.07.2026

: 08.07.2026

E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

DAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL

WRIT PETITION NO: 813/2024

ONSTRUCTIONS,, REP. BY ITS

AI PRANEETH REDDY, S/O.K.V.RA

9 YEARS, OCC- CONTRACTOR,

D,KUTA

GULLA,

KADIRI,S

RAM) DISTRICT.

AND

ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY

ROADS

AND

BUILDINGS

D

ILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVAT

ENGINEER,

RANDB

NH

SHNA DISTRICT.

G ENGINEER, RANDB CIRCLE,AN

ISTRICT.

ENGINEER, RANDB DIVISION,DH

DISTRICT.

ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY

FINANCE

AND

PLANNING

D

RC,J

DESH

LAPATI

S MANAGING

AMACHANDRA

R/O.D.NO.L5-

SRI

SATYA

...PETITIONER

Y PRINCIPAL

DEPARTMENT,

THI.

AND

CRF,

NANTAPURAM,

ARMAVARAM,

Y PRINCIPAL

DEPARTMENT,

RC,J

SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondents in withholding the payment an amount of Rs.8,20,10,381/- even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the work i.e Widening and Strengthening of road from Roddam pavagada road to dodagatta state Border road from km 0/0 to 10/0

(Working reach from km 0/0 to 4/500) and Improvements to road from Peddakodipalli to Narnagepalli (Via) R.Locherla Bucheria of Roddam mandal from km 0/0 to even after 14/0 In ATP District (Working reach from 12/0 to 14/0), vide CR agreement No.90/2022-23, dated 31.03.2023 as the same is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider for payment of Rs.8,20,10,381/- with interest @12percent per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of above-mentioned work forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider for payment of final Bill amounts Rs.8,20,10,381/- with interest @12% per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of works i.e Widening and Strengthening of road from Roddam pavagada road to dodagatta state Border road from km 0/0 to 10/0 (Working reach from km 0/0 to 4/500) and Improvements to road from Peddakodipalli to Narnagepalli (Via) R.Locherla Bucheria of Roddam mandal from km 0/0 to 14/0 In ATP District (Working reach from 12/0 to 14/0)”, vide CR agreement No.90/2022-23, dated 31.03.2023 pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS

2.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

RC,J

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent authorities in withholding the payment of amount even after finalizing the bills payable to the petitioner in relation to the works executed by it.

2. Sri C.Praveen, learned Assistant Government Pleader for R&B, submitted that the amount claimed in this writ petition has duly been paid to the petitioner.

3. In view of the submission made by learned Assistant Government Pleader, nothing remains for adjudication in this writ petition and the same can be closed.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. If the petitioner feels that cause in this writ petition still survives, he can make an appropriate application within two (02) months. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 3rd July, 2026 RR Whether the order is :   Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No   Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead