Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/796/2026 of Y RAGHOTHAM REDDY Vs SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR on 2 July 2026
for orders : Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026 Date of uploading : 08.07.2026 APHC010076612026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 796/2026
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026
Date of uploading : 08.07.2026
APHC010076612026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 796/2026
Between:
1. Y RAGHOTHAM REDDY, S/O Y. VENKATRAMI REDDY,AGED
ABOUT 48 YEARS CONTRACTOR,RESIDENT OF G-6, V.S.
TOWERS, BALAJI NAGAR, KURNOOL CITY AND DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND
PLANNING
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522238.
2. SRI AJAY JAIN, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. HOUSING
DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI.522238
3. SRI T CHIRANJEEVI, THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, HOUSING
CORPORATION, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH.
4. SRI K GURAPPA YADAV, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC
HEALTH
DEPARTMENT,
KURNOOL,
KURNOOL
DISTRICT,
ANDHRA PRADESH.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt. 08.12.2025 of this Hon'ble Court made in WP. No.33887 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. C.YELLAIAH
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. MALLIKHARJUNA MOORTHY K (SC FOR A.P HOUSING
CORPORATION LIMITED)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:-
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.33887 of 2025, dated 08.12.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
03.07.2026 PNS
Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ☑