Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/29413/2024 of A V MOHAN REDDY Vs THE STATE OF AP on 2 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading APHC010563062024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 29413/2024 Between: 1. A V MOHAN REDDY, S/O VEMULA REDDY, FLAT NO. 108, SHANTHI APARTMENTS, BHAGYANAGAR

Date of reserved for orders

Date of pronouncement

Date of uploading

APHC010563062024

IN TH

FRID

THE HONOURA

WR

Between:

1. A V MOHAN RE

SHANTHI APARTM

1. THE STATE OF AP

AND BUILDINGS

VELAGAPUDI, GUN

2. THE STATE OF

SECRETARY TO G

PLANNING, SECR

DISTRICT.

3. THE

DISTRICT

PULIVENDULA YSR

4. THE SUPERINTEN

KADAPA, YSR KAD

5. THE EXECUTIVE

s :

: 03.07.2026

: 08.07.2026

E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

DAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL

RIT PETITION NO: 29413/2024

DDY, S/O VEMULA REDDY, FL

MENTS, BHAGYANAGAR COLONY, K

AND

P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRET

DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT

NTUR DISTRICT.

ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY IT

GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF

ETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAV

COLLECTOR

AND

CHAIRMAN

R DISTRICT, KADAPA.

NDING ENGINEER, ROADS AND

DAPA (ERSTWHILE KADAPA) DISTR

ENGINEER, ROADS AND BUILDIN

RC,J

DESH

LAPATI

LAT NO. 108,

KADAPA.

...PETITIONER

TARY, ROADS

T BUILDINGS,

TS PRINCIPAL

FINANCE AND

VATI, GUNTUR

N,

,

PADA

D BUILDINGS,

RICT.

NGS DIVISION,

RC,J

PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA (ERSTWHILE KADAPA) DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of mandamus any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondents in withholding the payment an amount of Rs.1.31,83,315.00/-even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the work i.e., Construction of R and B

InspectionBungalow, Vempalli in YSR District., vide agreement No./2022-23, Dated 02-04-2022, as the same is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider for payments of Rs.1,31,83,315.00/-with interest @12 percentage per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of above-mentioned Work forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to consider for payment of final Bill amounts Rs.1,31,83,315.00/-with interest @12 percentage per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of works i.e.

Construction of R&B InspectionBungalow, Vempalli in YSR District., vide agreement No./2022- 23, Dated 02-04-2022, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant Leave for filing of the Counter Affidavit in WP.No.29413 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.SRAVAN KUMAR NAIDANA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS

2.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

RC,J

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent authorities in withholding the payment of the amount to the tune of Rs.1,31,83,315/- even after finalizing the bills in relation to the work i.e. “Construction of R&B Inspection Bungalow, Vempalli in YSR District”.

2. Heard Sri Sravan Kumar Naidana, learned counsel for petitioner, and Sri C.Praveen, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, on counter, submitted that the authorities have admitted the balance net amount due to the petitioner at Rs.1,20,97,930/- and sought six (06) months time for payment of the balance amount due.

4. Sri Sravan Kumar Naidana, learned counsel for petitioner, reported no objection for receiving the amount stated in the counter and also for granting time as sought for by the learned Assistant Government Pleader.

5. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of, directing the authorities concerned to pay to the petitioner the amount of Rs.1,20,97,930/- to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate not later than six RC,J

(06) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 3rd July, 2026 RR Whether the order is :   Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No   Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead