Andhra Pradesh High Court

CMA/442/2013 of ITD CEMENTATION INDIA LIMITED Vs AP IRRIGATION AND CAD DEPARTMENT & 3 ORS on 1 July 2026

for judgment : Date of pronouncement : 02.07.2026 Date of uploading : 03.07.2026 APHC010264002013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3597] THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B

Date of reserved for judgment

:

Date of pronouncement

: 02.07.2026

Date of uploading

: 03.07.2026

APHC010264002013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 442/2013

Between:

1. ITD CEMENTATION INDIA LIMITED, [FORMERLY KOWN AS

SKANSKA CEMENTATION INDIA PVT LTD] O/O.REGD OFFICE: IST

FLOOR, DANI WOOLTEX COMPOUND, 158, VIDYANAGARI MARG, KALINA SANTACRUZ [E], MUMBAI-400 098.

...APPELLANT

AND

1. AP IRRIGATION AND CAD DEPARTMENT 3 ORS, REP BY ITS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

IRRIGATION

AND

CAD

DEPARTMENT

O/O.SECRETARIAT,

HYDERABAD.

2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, O/O.NORTH COAST, VISAKHAPATNAM.

3. THE

PROJECT

ADMINISTRATOR

AND

SUPERINTENDING

ENGINEER, IRRIAGATION AND CAD DEPARTMENT O/O.TTPR

CIRCLE, VIZIANAGARAM - 535 003.

4. THE

EXECUTIVE

ENGINEER,

O/O.TBP

DIVISION

NO.1,

PARVATHIPURAM, VIZIANGARAM - 535 463.

...RESPONDENTS

Counsel for the Appellant:

1. S RAM BABU

Counsel for the Respondent:

1. GP FOR ARBITRATION

The Court made the following:

Page 1 of 2

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No: 442/2013

JUDGMENT:

(as per Hon’ble Sri Justice D. Ramesh)

Heard Sri S.Rambabu, learned counsel for the appellant.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appeal is filed against section 9 of the Arbitration Act. Now both parties have on instructions submitted that the main Arbitration proceedings itself have been taken place and concluded in this matter.

3. Considering the said submission, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal shall stand closed.

__________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH

______________________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI

02.07. 2026 PSK

Whether the order is:

Speaking

Reasoned

Reportable Non- reportable

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No: 442/2013

02.07.2026 PSK W

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead