Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/17481/2023 of A GOPALA KRISHNA Vs THE STATE OF AP on 1 July 2026
for orders : --- Date of pronouncement : 02.07.2026 Date of uploading : 02.07.2026 APHC010341612023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO:
Date of reserved for orders : ---
Date of pronouncement : 02.07.2026
Date of uploading : 02.07.2026
APHC010341612023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
WRIT PETITION NO: 17481/2023
Between:
1. A GOPALA KRISHNA, S/O NANCHAILIAH, AGED ABOUT
43 YEARS, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF
DIRECTOR OF ADULT EDUCATION, A.P. ANJANEYA
TOWERS,
IBRAHIMPATNAM,
VIJAYAWADA,
NTR
DISTRICT.
2. M. SRINIVAS,, S/O NANCHARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45
YEARS, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF DIRECTOR
OF ADULT EDUCATION, A.P. ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
2. DIRECTOR OF ADULT EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
ANJANEYA
TOWERS,
IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.
3. DEPARTMENTAL
PROMOTION
COMMITTEE,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER (DIRECTOR OF
ADULT
EDUCATION)
GOVERNMENT
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
E SOMASEKHAR REDDY, SUPERVISOR, AGED ABOUT 52
4. YEARS, O/O DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ADULT EDUCATION, OLD RIMS BUILDING, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ. Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring Government Memo No.ESE01-AEDNODAE
(MISC)/25/2020-PROG.III,dated 13.06.2022 extending the benefit of seniority in favour of the unofficial Respondent and Proceedings in Rc.No.975/Al/DAE/2014 dated 02.05.2023 issued by the Director of Adult Education, Andhra Pradesh as wholly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and without jurisdiction and consequently declare that the unofficial Respondent is not entitled for notional seniority over and above the Petitioners and the seniority of the Petitioners in the cadres of Assistant Project Officer and Assistant Director is not liable to be altered and pass the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the Government Memo No.ESE01- AEDNODAE (MISC)/25/2020-PROG.III, dated 13.06.2022 extending the benefit of notional seniority in favour of the unofficial Respondent
and
Proceedings
in
Rc.No.975/Al/DAE/2014 dated 02.05.2023 issued by the Director of Adult Education, Andhra Pradesh and pass the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order dt.17.07.2023 passed in WP No. 17481 of 2023 in the interest of justice and to pass the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim Orders
passed on 17-07-2023 in W.P.No.17481 of 2023 as devoid of merits and may be please to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. ADAPA RAMYA SAHITHI NAIDU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES III
2. M/S INDUS LAW FIRM
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a memo dated 30.06.2026 has been filed before the Registry along with a letter dated 30.06.2026 addressed by the petitioners and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition, inter alia, stating that the petitioners intend to withdraw the same.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, the interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this writ petition shall also stand dismissed.
____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J
2nd July, 2026
Note: Issue C.C. by 02.07.2026 B/o cbn
Whether the order is:
Speaking Yes Reasoned No Reportable No Non-Reportable Yes
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
WRIT PETITION NO: 17481/2023
2nd July, 2026
cbn