Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/17481/2023 of A GOPALA KRISHNA Vs THE STATE OF AP on 1 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

for orders : --- Date of pronouncement : 02.07.2026 Date of uploading : 02.07.2026 APHC010341612023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO:

Date of reserved for orders : ---

Date of pronouncement : 02.07.2026

Date of uploading : 02.07.2026

APHC010341612023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA

PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

WRIT PETITION NO: 17481/2023

Between:

1. A GOPALA KRISHNA, S/O NANCHAILIAH, AGED ABOUT

43 YEARS, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF

DIRECTOR OF ADULT EDUCATION, A.P. ANJANEYA

TOWERS,

IBRAHIMPATNAM,

VIJAYAWADA,

NTR

DISTRICT.

2. M. SRINIVAS,, S/O NANCHARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45

YEARS, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF DIRECTOR

OF ADULT EDUCATION, A.P. ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT

BUILDINGS,

VELAGAPUDI,

GUNTUR

DISTRICT.

2. DIRECTOR OF ADULT EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH,

ANJANEYA

TOWERS,

IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.

3. DEPARTMENTAL

PROMOTION

COMMITTEE,

REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER (DIRECTOR OF

ADULT

EDUCATION)

GOVERNMENT

OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT

E SOMASEKHAR REDDY, SUPERVISOR, AGED ABOUT 52

4. YEARS, O/O DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ADULT EDUCATION, OLD RIMS BUILDING, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ. Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring Government Memo No.ESE01-AEDNODAE

(MISC)/25/2020-PROG.III,dated 13.06.2022 extending the benefit of seniority in favour of the unofficial Respondent and Proceedings in Rc.No.975/Al/DAE/2014 dated 02.05.2023 issued by the Director of Adult Education, Andhra Pradesh as wholly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and without jurisdiction and consequently declare that the unofficial Respondent is not entitled for notional seniority over and above the Petitioners and the seniority of the Petitioners in the cadres of Assistant Project Officer and Assistant Director is not liable to be altered and pass the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the Government Memo No.ESE01- AEDNODAE (MISC)/25/2020-PROG.III, dated 13.06.2022 extending the benefit of notional seniority in favour of the unofficial Respondent

and

Proceedings

in

Rc.No.975/Al/DAE/2014 dated 02.05.2023 issued by the Director of Adult Education, Andhra Pradesh and pass the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order dt.17.07.2023 passed in WP No. 17481 of 2023 in the interest of justice and to pass the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim Orders

passed on 17-07-2023 in W.P.No.17481 of 2023 as devoid of merits and may be please to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. ADAPA RAMYA SAHITHI NAIDU

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES III

2. M/S INDUS LAW FIRM

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a memo dated 30.06.2026 has been filed before the Registry along with a letter dated 30.06.2026 addressed by the petitioners and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition, inter alia, stating that the petitioners intend to withdraw the same.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, the interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this writ petition shall also stand dismissed.

____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J

2nd July, 2026

Note: Issue C.C. by 02.07.2026 B/o cbn

Whether the order is:

Speaking Yes Reasoned No Reportable No Non-Reportable Yes

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

WRIT PETITION NO: 17481/2023

2nd July, 2026

cbn

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead