AS/638/2016 of Nadella Sarath Chandra Babu, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 1 July 2026

Date of reserved for orders :

Date of pronouncement :

Date of uploading :

APHC010597442016

IN THE H

(

THURSD

THE HONOU

THE HONOURABL

AP

Between:

1. NADELLA SARATH C

HINDU, AGED ABOU

PEDAPROLU, MOPID

2. ., -

3. ., -

1. THE STATE OF AN

COLLECTOR,

KRIS

MACHILIPATNAM

2. THE DISTRICT CHAIR

KRISHNA DISTRICT,

3. THE

DISTRICT PA

MACHILIPATNAM, PJ

Allow the above appe

dated:28/01/2016 made an

02.07.2026

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

AY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

URABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

LE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVAR

PPEAL SUIT NO: 638/2016

CHANDRA BABU,, S/ O. VENKATESWA

UT 57 YEARS, CONTRACTOR, RESI

DEVI MANDAL JCJC, AVANIGADDA.

...APPE

AND

NDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED

SHNA

DISTRICT

MACHILIPATNAM

RMAN, DISTRICT SAND AUCTION CO

MACHILIPATNAM PJCJ, MACHILIPAT

ANCHAYAT OFFICER, KRISHNA D

JCJ MACHILIPATNAM

...RESPON

eal while setting aside the Judgement a

nd passed in O.S. No. 2 of 2007 on the

RTHI

ARA RAO,

IDENT OF

ELLANT(S)

D BY ITS

M

PJCJ,

OMMITTEE

NAM

DISTRICT,

NDENT(S):

and Decree

e file of the

Learned Principle District Judge, Krishna District, Machlipatnam in the interest of justice and to pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of operation of the judgment and decree dated 28/01/2016 made and passed in OS.No. 2 of 2007, on the file of the Learned Principal District Judge, Krishna District, Machilipatnam, pending disposal of the above appeal in the interest of justice and to pass

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased enlarge the time for complying the condition of deposit by granting any further time preferably four weeks from this day since the stitulated time expried on 27.09.2016 as per interim orders dated 02.08.2016 passed in ASMP

No.1427/2016in AS No.638/2016 so as to enable me to deposit the balance amount out of 50% decretal amount with the trial court in the interest of justice

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant(S):

1.A SURYANARAYANA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR APPEALS (AP)

2.GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI

APPEAL SUIT NO: 638/2016

Judgment: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh)

The present Appeal Suit is filed challenging the judgment and decree dated 28.01.2016 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Krishna District, Machilipatnam, in O.S.No.2 of 2007.

2.

On 08.10.2025 and 18.06.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. Even today, none present to press the appeal despite listing the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Hence, it clearly shows that the appellants are not interested to prosecute the case.

3.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

____________

D.RAMESH, J

________________________

B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI, J

Dated : 02.07.2026

TJN

Whether the order is :

Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No

Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI

APPEAL SUIT NO: 638/2016

Dated : 02.07.2026

TJN

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AT AMARAVATI

APPEAL SUIT NO: 638/2016

PROCEEDING SHEET

SL.

NO.

DATE