Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/4436/2024 of V. DEEPA Vs T.S. CHETAN on 1 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement :02.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010531182024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4436/2024

Date of reserved for orders :

Date of pronouncement :02.07.2026

Date of uploading :

APHC010531182024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4436/2024

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. V. DEEPA, W/O J. VENKATESH, AGED 33 YEAR, YEARS, DOOR NO. 3-18, CHILAMATHUR MANDAL, PENUKONDA REVENUE DIVISION, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT.

2. M.K. RAJIYA BHANU,, W/O M.K. USEN SAB, AGED 54 YEARS, DOOR NO. 3-110, CHILAMATHUR VILLAGE, CHILAMATHUR MANDAL,

3. B.SARSVATHI,, W/O ADINARYANA REDDY, AGED 44 YEARS, DOOR.NO. 10-31, MARAVAKOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, CHILAMATHUR MANDAL, PENUKONDA REVENUE DIVISION, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT.

4. S MUBEERNA,, W/O S. PER BHAKTHAR VALI, AGED 33 YEARS, DOOR. NO. 2-156, CHILAMATHUR VILLAGE, CHILAMATHUR MANDAL PENUKONDA REVENUE DIVISION, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT.

5. C.GAYATHRI, W/O C. GOVIND RAJ, AGED 35 YEARS, DOOR.NO. 1- 117, KOTHACHAMALAPALLI VILLAGE, CHILAMATHUR MANDAL PENUKONDA REVENUE DIVISION, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT.

6. N.BHAVANI,, W/O N. RAMA CHANDRA, AGED 34 YEARS, DOOR NO. 1-54,

KODUR VILLAGE, CHILAMATHUR MANDAL, PENUKONDA REVENUE DIVISION, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. T S CHETAN, The District Collector, Sri SatyaSai District, Puttaparthy.

...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act for will full violation of the orders of this Honourable court and for not implementing the orders of this Honourable Court in W.P.No.225 of 2024 dated 12-01-2024 by Honourable Sri Justice RAVI CHEEMALAPATI and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to dispense with my personal appearance on 19.03.2026 in C.C.No. 4436 of 2024 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to implead the Proposed Respondent Sri A. Shyam Prasad, District Collector, Sri Satya Sai District,as respondent no.2 in the contempt case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. PONNADA SREE VYAS Counsel for the Contemnor:

1. J DILEEP KUMAR The Court made the following order:

This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of orders dated 12.01.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.225/2024.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, pursuant to filing of this contempt case, the respondent authorities have passed orders and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case, however sought liberty to question the orders passed by the respondent authorities.

3. Recording the said submission, the contempt case is closed. However the petitioners are at liberty to question the orders passed by the respondent authorities in accordance with law. No costs.

Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.

________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 02.07.2026 BRS

Whether the order is :

Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead