WP/16930/2026 of Raja Primary and E.M. High School Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 30 June 2026

1. RAJA PRIMARY AND E.M. HIGH SCHOOL, REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT SRI. M. VARA PRASAD REDDY SRIKALAHASTHI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 517640

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE TULLURU, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522238

2. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF TRIBAL WELFARE TULLURU, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS

VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522238

3. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT

FINANCE DEPARTMENT,

TULLURU, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS

VELAGAPUDI, KRISHNA DISTRICT.522238

4. DIRECTOR SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, D. NO.40-3/1-46-4A, WARD NO. 13,

KONERU LAKSHMAIAH STREET, MOGHALRAJPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH - 520010

5. DIRECTOR TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, D. NO.40-3/1-46-4A, WARD NO. 13, KONERU LAKSHMAIAH STREET,

MOGHALRAJPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH - 520010

6. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICE SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, B BLOCK, COLLECTORATE, THIRUCHANUR BY-PASS ROAD TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.517501

7. THE DISTRICT TRIBAL AND EMPOWERMENT OFFICER TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, B BLOCK, COLLECTORATE, THIRUCHANUR BY-PASS ROAD TIRUPATI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.517501

8. THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, ALIPIRI ROAD. OPPOSITE MAHATHI AUDITORIUM, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTIRCT. 517501

...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:

Sri Vijay Mathukumilli Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP for Social Welfare

GP for Finance Planning The Court made the following order:

Heard Sri Sri Vijay Mathukumilli, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance and Planning appearing for respondents.

2. The instant writ petition is filed challenging the action of the respondents in not releasing the admitted amounts of Rs.10,60,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Sixty Thousand only) incurred by the petitioner towards expenditure under the scheme "Best Available School Scheme" introduced by the Government for the academic year 2024-2025 and 2025-2026,

3. The Learned counsel for petitioner contends that the 1st respondent introduced a scheme, "Best Available School Scheme" in terms of G.O.Ms.No.101, dated 31.05.2008. It is submitted that the petitioner institution which is a private unaided school has maintained high standards of excellence and provided all infrastructural facilities to its students. It had admitted the students under the BAS scheme and claimed the benefits of the scheme.

4. It is contended that the scheme was first introduced in 1995 and was subsequently, the Scheme was amended from time to time. The quantum of the reimbursement was fixed at Rs.20,000/- per annum for day-scholars and Rs.30,000/- per annum for hostellers. Thereafter, the 1st respondent issued G.O.Ms.No.22, dated 21.03.2017, prescribing the procedure for selection of institutions under the Scheme.

5. Learned counsel further submitted that, in terms of the Scheme, a Committee headed by the District Collector is constituted to inspect the institutions with reference to the standards of excellence and infrastructure. Based on the prescribed standards that the respective institutions have maintained, the institutions would be selected for sanction of the benefits under the Scheme. The petitioner institution was selected under the Scheme for the academic years 2024-2025 and 2025-2026. It is further contended that, despite the petitioner having incurred the expenditure and the amounts being admitted by the respondents, the reimbursement has not been released. Hence, the instant writ petition is filed.

6. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare placed before the Court a copy of the written instructions received from the 4th respondent, dated

30.06.2026. A perusal of the same would reflects that the bills submitted by the petitioner for an amount of Rs.9,70,000/- are under process and are pending clearance by the Finance Department. It is further stated that the bills were returned by the Drawing and Disbursing Officer (DDO) on 31.03.2026, as the budget for the relevant financial year had lapsed. It is further stated that, upon sanction of the requisite budget, the bills will be resubmitted for processing and payment.

7. Having regard to the above, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to release the amounts due to the petitioner, within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

8. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 01.07.2026 BSK

Whether the order is: Speaking

Reasoned ☑ Reportable

Non-reportable ☑

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NO: 16930 OF 2026

Date: 01.07.2026 BSK