Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/606/2026 of Kudithi Srinivasa Rao, Vs Sri Mukesh Kumar Meena on 30 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010068502026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY, THE 1st DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 606/2026 Between: 1.

Date of reserved for orders :

Date of pronouncement :

Date of uploading :

APHC010068502026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA

PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 1st DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 606/2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. KUDITHI SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O LATE K. RAMUDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, R/O MAVIDILOVA AND DABBANDA VILLAGE, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISHAKAPATNAM DISTRICT , ANDARAPRADESH

...PETITIONER AND

1. SRI MUKESH KUMAR MEENA, REPS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. SRI M N HARENDHIRA PRASAD, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM.

3. SRI SANGEETH MATHUR, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,

BHEEMUNIPATNAM, VISAKAPATNAM DISTRICT.

4. SRI P SYAMPRASAD, THE TAHSILDAR, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT

...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue notice, summons to the respondents herein and punish the respondent under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 22.08.2025 and 22.12.2025 passed W.P.No.22272 of 2025 Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. N MANIK RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. The Court made the following:

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY C.C.No.606 of 2026 O R DE R:

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that pursuant to the order of this Court, the case of the Petitioner was considered for revocation and accordingly suspension was revoked by proceedings dated 31.06.2026.

2. Noting the said submission, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed.

__________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 01.07.2026

KLP

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead