Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/21502/2007 of SHAIK HANEEF, KURNOOL DISTRICT Vs AP STATE WAKF BOARD, HYDERABAD & 3 OTHERS on 29 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

for orders : -------- Date of pronouncement : 30.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010348292007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:

Date of reserved for orders : --------

Date of pronouncement : 30.06.2026

Date of uploading :

APHC010348292007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF JUNE 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 21502/2007

Between:

1. SHAIK HANEEF, KURNOOL DISTRICT, S/O N.IBRAHIM SAHEB, RETIRED GOVT.EMPLOYEE R/O H.NO.28/759-194, NGOS COLONY, NOONEPALLE, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. AP STATE WAKF BOARD HYDERABAD 3 OTHERS, REPRESENTED

BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, HAJ HOUSE OPP:PUBLIC

GARDEN, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD.

2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MINORITIES WELFARE AND WAKF, GOVERNMENT

OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH,

SECRETARIAT,

HYDERABAD.

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, AT KURNOOL.

4. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, NANDYAL, AT NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

5. SRI B SHANKAR, LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER/ REVENUE

DIVISIONAL OFFICER (RETD), R/O H.NO.23/166, NALBAND

STREET, ANANTHAPURAM, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. R5 IS

IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DT.19.12.2025 IN

I.A.NO.01 OF 2018

6. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERCUM, REVENUE DIVISIONAL

OFFICER, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT, A.P R6 IMPLEADED AS

PER COURTS ORDER DT. 01.05.2026 IN I.A.NO. 1 OF 2026

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularlyone in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent Memo No.32/Wakf-A/A2/2007-1 dt.11-09-2007 in respect of the Wakf property and its attached lands in Sy.No.284/2 to an extent of Ac.22.4 cents situated at Noonepalli Village, Nandyal Mandal, Kurnool District as illegal, arbitrary and contravention of the Wakf Act and liable to be declared as void and grant other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit andproper in the circumstances of the case.

IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 27884 OF 2007

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the 1st respondent Memo No.2/Wakf-A/A2/2007-1 dt.11.09-2007 and its consequential proceedings allotment of the plots of the wakf property and its attached lands in Sy.No.284/2 to an extent of ac.22.4 cents situated at Noonepalli Village, Nandyal Mandal, Kurnool District, pending disposal of the Writ petition and grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit andprope rin the circumstances of the case.

IA NO: 1 OF 2018

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed respondent 5 as respondent No.5 in W.P.No.21502 of

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to implead the proposed respondents as respondent no.6 in the main writ petition vide W.P.No.21502 of 2007 and as well in interlocutory applications filed in support of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SUBHANI S M

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. SHAIK KARIMULLAH (SC FOR WAKF BOARD RAYALASEEMA)

2. GP FOR REVENUE

3. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE

4. MOHD HABEEBUR RAHMAN

5. SHAIK KHAJA BASHA

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Sri S.M.Subhani, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the sole writ petitioner has died and that he is unable to contact the legal representatives.

In view of the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as abated. If the legal representatives have any interest in prosecuting the writ petition, they are at liberty to file an appropriate application in accordance with law within a period of two (02) months. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________

JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

Date: 30.06.2026. JLV

Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 21502/2007

Date: 30.06.2026 JLV

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead