Andhra Pradesh High Court
MACMA/1118/2007 of S.RASOOL BEE & 3 ORS Vs S.PENCHALA REDDY & ANR on 29 June 2026
for orders : Date of pronouncement : 30.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010382942007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement : 30.06.2026
Date of uploading :
APHC010382942007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF JUNE 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1118/2007
Between:
1. S.RASOOL BEE & 3 ORS, W/O.CHINNA VALI R/O.N.KOTTALAPALLI
VILLAGE, GUNTAKAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
2. S.UMMAR BASHA, S/O.CHINNA VALI P2 BEING MINOR REP BY HIS
MOTHER
&
GUARDIAN
P1
R/O.N.KOTTALAPALLI
VILLAGE,
GUNTAKAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
3. S.LAKMA
SAB
@
BUDEN
SAB,
S/O.JAMNA
SAB
R/O.N.KOTTALAPALLI VILLAGE, GUNTAKAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR
DISTRICT.
4. S.KHASIM
BEE,
W/O.S.LAKMA
SAB
@
BUDEN
SAB
R/O.N.KOTTALAPALLI VILLAGE, GUNTAKAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR
DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT(S)
AND
1. S PENCHALA REDDY ANR, S/O.S.SESHA REDDY, AGED MAJOR
R/O.D.NO.1/8, CHINNA VARADAVAPALLI VILLAGE, PRODDATUR
MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.
2. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD, REP BY ITS DIVISIONAL
MANAGER THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE
COMPANY LTD., ANANTAPUR.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High Court Counsel for the Appellant(S):
BHARATH REDDY JUTUR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. RAMA MOHAN RAO KOTHA
2. P HARINATH GUPTA
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
1. None appeared for the appellants.
2. Despite of matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, the appellants are not evinced any interest to proceed with the matter.
3. Therefore, the M.A.C.M.A. is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
Interim orders granted, if any, shall stand vacated.
As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Date: 30.06.2026 KRS
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
M.A.C.M.A.No.1118 of 2007 ( JUDGMNET )
DATE: 30.06.2026
KRS