Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/30030/2023 of MUTHYALA SIVAKOTAMMA Vs THE STATE OF AP on 29 June 2026
reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : 0 APHC010579482023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE 30 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 30030/2023 Between: 1. MUTHYALA SIVAKOTAMMA, W/O. LATE M. KOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O.
Date of reserved for orders
Date of pronouncement
Date of uploading : 0
APHC010579482023
IN TH
TUESD
THE HONOURA
WR
Between:
1. MUTHYALA SIVAK
ABOUT 58 YEARS
MANDAL, SPSR N
1. THE STATE OF A
DEPARTMENT,
GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE DISTRICT C
DI.STRICT.
3. THE REVENUE D
DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHSILDHAR
DISTRICT.
5. THE SPECIAL COL
PROJECT, NELLOR
6. THE SPECIAL DE
ATMAKUR, SPSR N
7. BOCHU SRINIVAS
ITHAMPADU VILLA
DISTRICT. ...RESP
Petition under Articl
circumstances stated in
pleased to leased to issu
or direction declaring the
s :
: 30.06.2026
02.07.2026
E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
DAY, THE 30th DAY OF JUNE 2026
PRESENT
ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL
RIT PETITION NO: 30030/2023
KOTAMMA, W/O. LATE M. KOTA
S, R/O. ITHAMPADU VILLAGE,
ELLORE DISTRICT
AND
AP, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADES
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI,
T. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRET
OLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE, SP
DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KAVALI, SP
R, DAGADARTHI MANDAL, SPS
LLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION, TE
RE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
EPUTY COLLECTOR LA, SOMASI
NELLORE DISTRICT.
SULA REDDY, S/O. SAMBI RE
AGE, DAGADARTHI MANDAL, SP
PONDENTS
...RES
le 226 of the Constitution of India pra
the affidavit filed therewith, the High
ue a vmt of mandamus or any other
action of the respondents in trying to
RC,J
DESH
LAPATI
AIAH, AGED
DAGADARTHI
...PETITIONER
H REVENUE
AMARAVATHI,
TARY.
PSR NELLORE
PSR NELLORE
SR NELLORE
LUGU GANGA
LA PROJECT,
EDDY, R/O.
PSR NELLORE
SPONDENT(S):
aying that in the
h Court may be
appropriate writ
o dispossess the
RC,J
Petitioner from land of an extent Ac.0.80 cents in Sy.No.24-3 of Ithampadu Village, Dagadarthi Mandal, SPSR Nellore District by changing the entries in the revenue records, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the Petitioner possession and enjoyment of the petitioner i / over the land of an extent hc.2.07 cents in Sy.No.24-3 situated at Ithampadu Village, Dagadarthi Mandal, SPSR Nellore District and not to alter the revenue records and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities not to dispossess the Petitioner from land of an extent Ac.0.80 cents in Sy.No.24-3 of Ithampadu Village, Dagadarthi Mandal, SPSR Nellore District during pendency of the Writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities not to alter the entries in the revenue records with respect to land of an extent Ac.0.80 cents in Sy.No.24-3 of Ithampadu Village, Dagadarthi Mandal, SPSR Nellore District belonging to the petitioner during pendency of the Writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.C SUBODH
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE
2.GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION
The Court made the following:
RC,J
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Ms.Harika, learned counsel, representing Sri C.Subodh, learned counsel for petitioner, submitted that they addressed a letter darted 15.06.2026 to the registry enclosing the letter addressed to the learned counsel for the petitioner by the writ petitioner dated 02.05.2026 wherein she stated that she wants to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Perused the letter addressed to the registry by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the letter addressed to the learned counsel by the writ petitioner.
3. Permission as sought is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 30TH June, 2026
RR Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No