Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/2605/2023 of B. Aruna, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 28 June 2026
for orders : --- Date of pronouncement : 29.06.2026 Date of uploading : 02.07.2026 APHC010053012023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION
Date of reserved for orders
:
---
Date of pronouncement
: 29.06.2026
Date of uploading
: 02.07.2026
APHC010053012023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JUNE 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION No.2605/2023
Between:
1. B. ARUNA, W/O. ESHWARAIAH, AGED 31 YEARS, OCC- ANGANWADI HELPER, RESIDING AT GARUDAMPALLY
VILLAGE,
DHARAMAVRAM
MANDAL,
ANANTAPURAM
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT'S
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATI. GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, PUTTAPARTHY.
3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WOMEN AND CHILD
DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, PUTTAPARTHY.
4. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, (CDPO)
DHARMAVARAM, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or
Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the orders passed in Rc.No.27/A/2023, dated 23.01.2023
by the 4th respondent is illegal, arbitrary, and against the principles of natural justice and the same is passed without proper enquiry in the Village and consequently set-aside the said orders by considering the petitioner's promotion as Anganwadi Worker at Garudampally Centre in Dharmavaram ICDS Project.
IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Orders in Rc.No.27/A/2023 dated 23.01.2023 passed by the 4th respondent, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SESHADRI GOALLA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES II
The Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Seshadri Goalla, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration and the matter has become infructuous.
Recording the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand dismissed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:29.06.2026 DSH
Whether the order is: Speaking √ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-Reportable √