WP/18687/2012 of Malineni Chenchu Ramaiah, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 28 June 2026

1. MALINENI CHENCHU RAMAIAH,, S/O. SOMAIAH, AGED 57 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, RIO. PEDDAKANUMALLA VILLAGE, SINGARAYAKONDA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, AGRICULTURE AND COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD.

2. DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE.

3. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, THE PRAKASAM DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL -BANK LIMITED, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT

4. THE CHAGALLU PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE, CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED NO. V.662, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, CHAGALLU VILLAGE, ULAVAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be

BKM,J W.P.No.18687 of 2012

pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring inaction on the part of respondents on the petitioner's representations dt. 15.03.2012 and 31.03.2012 for admitting him to duties after having become fit to resume to duty as Special Category Assistant in the office of 3rd respondent or alternatively secretary in the office of 4th respondent, as illegal, irregular, irrational and violative of articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and also provisions of Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 and rules framed there under and consequently direct the respondents to initiate necessary action for the petitioner's admission to duties IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 23950 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to initiate necessary action for the petitioner's admission to duties as Special Category Assistant in the office of 3rd respondent or alternatively Secretary in the office of 4th respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit the legal representatives to come on record as parties/proposed Petitioners per LRs of deceased sole Writ Petitioner to the main Writ Petition in W.P No. 18687 of 2012 and pending Interlocutory Applications therein, in the interests of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. RAVI KUMAR C

2. .

BKM,J W.P.No.18687 of 2012

The Court made the following Order:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent.

2. Both the learned counsels submit that the petitioner died on 04.09.2019, thereafter, no further steps have been taken. However, in view of the relief sought in this writ petition nothing survives for adjudication. However, if the Legal Representatives of the deceased petitioner have any grievance pursuant to the service of the deceased petitioner, they can work out their remedies separately in accordance with law.

3. In view of the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN

29.06.2026 PGT

Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Recorded Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No