WP/16587/2024 of M. Neelakanta Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 28 June 2026

1. M. NEELAKANTA, S/O M. PRABHAKAR AGE 31 YEARS, OCC SOCIAL WORKER, R/O D. NO. 23-8-83, ROYAL NAGAR, TIRUPATI.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT

2. THE SECRETARY, BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION TADEPALLI GUNTUR DISTRICT

3. THE REGIONAL INSPECTION OFFICER CUM ENQUIRY OFFICER, BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT.

4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTOR OFFICE, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT.

5. BVK JUNIOR COLLEGE, AMARAVATHI IIT-JEE ACADEMY, DOCTOR'S MEDICAL ACADEMY, REP BY ITS PRINCIPLE, RAGHAVENDRA NAGAR, NEAR SAI BABA TEMPLE, OPPOSITE SAI DURGA BANQUET HALL, TIRUPATI

6. BVK JUNIOR COLLEGE, AMARAVATHI IIT-JEE ACADEMY, DOCTORS MEDICAL ACADEMY. RAGHAVENDRA NAGAR,

BESIDES SAI DURGA BANQUET HALL. NEAR SAI BABA TEMPLE, TIRUPATI

7. BVK JUNIOR COLLEGE, AMARAVATHI IIT-JEE ACADEMY, DOCTORS MEDICAL ACADEMY, REP BY ITS PRINCIPLE, SRI KRISHNA NAGAR, 9TH CROSS, HEMPRAKASH RESIDENCY, MRPALLY, TIRUPATI

8. BVK JUNIOR COLLEGE, AMARAVATHI IIT- JEE ACADEMY, DOCTORS MEDICAL ACADEMY, REP BY ITS PRINCIPLE, AMBEDKAR COLONY, AVILALA BESIDES NATIONAL HIGHWAY TIRUPATI BYPASS ROAD, OPPOSITE NAYARA PETROL BUNK, TIRUPATI RURAL.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the 3rd and 4th respondents in not taking any action against the respondent no. 5 to 8 colleges who are operating junior colleges in the buildings which are not having any permissions as against the G.O.Ms no. 29 Education Rules dated 05.02.1987 that too without recognition and affiliation from the authorities, inspite of the representations dated 07.07.2024 and 12.07.2024 made by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the article 14,19 and 21 of the constitution and consequently direct the respondent no. 2 to 4 to conduct enquiry and take strict action against the respondent no. 5 to 8 colleges and report compliance to this Hon'ble Court, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to stop the illegal unauthorized operations of junior colleges in the incompetent buildings without prior permissions in the name of coaching centers by the respondent no. 5 to 8 and submit a status report on the action take in pursuance to the representation to 3rd and 4th respondents dated 07.07.2024 and 12.07.2024 respectively, and to take appropriate action against the respondent no. 5 to 8 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. ANGADA SATYA RAGHAVENDRA Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. P HEMACHANDRA

2. GP FOR REVENUE

3. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION

4. N RAJA RAJESWARA REDDY(STANDING COUNSEL FOR BIE) The Court made the following Order:

Sri Angada Satya Raghavendra, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 29-06-2026 MSI

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NO: 16587/2024

Dated: 29-06-2026 MSI