Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/40/2013 of Naresh Kumar Jain Vs Basant Kumar Kotari on 28 June 2026
for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010023722013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE 29 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 40/2013 Between: 1. NARESH KUMAR JAIN, S/O.LATE PAVAN
Date of reserved for orde
Date of pronouncement
Date of uploading
APHC010023722013
IN THE
MONDA
THE HONO
THE HONOURA
CIVIL MISC
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. NARESH KUMA BUSINESS R/O. VIZIANAGARAM
1. BASANT KUMAR R/o. Srinivas Nag Seven Star Electr Appeal Under Se IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CM Petition under Se stated in the affidavit fi be pleased to grant i making any constructio matter of OS No. 8 of Vizianagaram pending ers : : 29.06.2026 : HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) AY, THE 29th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT OURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH ABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMAL CELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 40/2013 AR JAIN, S/O.LATE PAVAN KUMA SRINIVAS NAGAR BEHIND NCS TH
...APPE AND R KOTARI, S/o. Sanwal Raj Kothari B gar Behinc NCS Theatre Vizianagaam a ricals Chinnaveedhi Vizianagaram ...RESPO ction_____against orders AMP 49 OF 2013 ction 151 CPC praying that in the circum led in support of the petition, the High C nteri injunction restraining the respond ons in petition schedule property which i f 2010 on the file of the 1st Addl. Distric disposal of the above Appeal. H
LLI AR JAIN HEATRE ELLANT Business and C/o. ONDENT mstances Court may dent from is subject ct Judge,
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. M S R SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent:
1. N SIVA REDDY The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 40/2013 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh)
The present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred challenging the judgment and decree dated 29.09.2012 passed by the learned I Additional District Judge, Vizianagaram, in I.A.No.550/2010 in O.S. No. 8 of 2010.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, submitted that the main suit has been disposed of. Hence, nothing remains for adjudication.
3. In view of the said submission, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
___________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI 29.06.2026 TJN
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 40/2013
29.06.2026 TJN