Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/191/2013 of THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION Vs NAGARJUNA NOTE BOOK MANUFACTURING COMPANY on 28 June 2026
pronouncement : 29.06.2026 Date of uploading : 06.07.2026 APHC010036812013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3587] MONDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL
Date of pronouncement : 29.06.2026
Date of uploading : 06.07.2026
APHC010036812013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JUNE 2026
PRESENT
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 191/2013
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION O/O.D.NO.5-9-23, HILL FORT ROAD, HYDERABAD.
...APPELLANT AND
1. NAGARJUNA NOTE BOOK MANUFACTURING COMPANY, rep by its Proprietor Tata Narasimha Rao O/o.Kothapet, Guntur.
...RESPONDENT IA NO: 1 OF 2008(CMAMP 846 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 9 days in filing the above CMA IA NO: 4 OF 2008(CMAMP 8286 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant:
1. V CH NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent:
1. S RAVINDRANATH
C.M.A.No.191 of 2013 This Court made the following JUDGMENT ((Per THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH) Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, submits that in view of the introduction of a new Scheme in the year 2025, the cause for further adjudication no longer survives. He, therefore, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.
2. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant and having regard to the subsequent policy change, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending shall stand closed. _____________ D. RAMESH, J
____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Dt: 29.06.2026 krk Whether the order is: Speaking ✓ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ✓
C.M.A.No.191 of 2013
Dt:29.06.2026 krk