Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/16985/2026 of PAPISETTY JANARDHANARAO Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 28 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

reserved for orders : - Date of pronouncement : 29.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010323332026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] MONDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 16985/2026

Date of reserved for orders : -

Date of pronouncement : 29.06.2026

Date of uploading :

APHC010323332026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JUNE 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 16985/2026

Between:

1. PAPISETTY JANARDHANARAO, S/O BRAMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59

YEARS, ASSISTANT BEAT OFFICER ( ABO), O/A DACHURU

SECTION, RAPUR RANGE, NELLORE (T) DIVISION, SPSR NELLORE

DISTRICT- 524001..

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF

SECRETARY TO GOVT., ENVIRONMENT, FORESTS, SCIENCE

ANDTECHNOLOGY

DEPARTMENT,

A.P.

SECRETARIAT,

VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522238.

2. THE STATE OF A P, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE

AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, 1ST FLOOR, 2ND BLOCK, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DIST-522238.

3. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, ARYABHAVAN, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522002.

4. THE DISTRICT FOREST OFFICER, NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE-

524001.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ , order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents not allowing the petitioner after 30.6.2026 to his duties as Assistant Beat Officer under the 4th

respondent as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law, Violation of principles of natural justice, violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of constitution of India and further direct the respondents to continue the petitioner till 62 years, on the ground that the case of the petitioner is pending for active consideration for regularisation before the respondents 1 to 3 herein in light of G.O. Ms.No. 114

Finance (HR.1 Plg and Policy) Dept., Dt.21.10.2023 vide proceedings Rc. No.

21796120061HR-3 dated 7.2.2025 and pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Assistant Beat Office (ABO) up to 62 Years and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. T V V KOTESWARA RAO

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES I

The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 16985 OF 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:-

The present Writ Petition is filed declaring the action of the respondents in not permitting the petitioner to continue his duties as Assistant Beat Officer under the respondent No.4 with effect from 30.06.2026, on the ground that he is attaining the age of 60 years, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. The Petitioner was initially appointed as Assistant Beat Officer on contract basis and the same was being extended from time to time. While so, an Act was issued “Andhra Pradesh Regularization of Services of Contract Employees Act, 2023, (in short “the Act”) which provided for regularization of Contract Employees.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would further submit that the proposals were sent by Principal Chief Conservator of Forests for regularization of 151 contract employees, working in the Forest Department as on 02.06.2014 and still working as on 21.10.2023. As per G.O.Ms.No.22, dated 16.03.2024, the Government regularized 119 contractual employees, leaving the balance of 32 employees. The reason for non-consideration of the Petitioner‟s case for regularization was „under scrutiny‟. In the proposals sent by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests for the second time on 07.02.2025 for regularization of 32 individuals, the name of the Petitioner was also included. It is on this ground that the Petitioner is questioning the impugned proceedings as his case for regularization is under active consideration.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondents would contend that the Petitioner is not entitled for continuing beyond 30.06.2026 as he was not regularized as on date. It was contended that as per G.O.Ms.No.15, dated 31.01.2022, the Andhra Pradesh Public Employment Regulation of Age of Superannuation Act, 1984 was amended by enhancing the age from 60 to 62 years would not apply to the case of the Petitioner.

5. Having heard the respective counsel and considering the fact that the issue of regularization of the Petitioner is under active consideration by the Government, the Petitioner would have to face hardship, in the event, regularization is with effect from 01.04.2024.

6. In that view, this Court considering peculiar scenario is inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition with following directions:

(i) The Petitioner shall continue as Assistant Beat Officer till the Respondent No.1 decides on the aspect of regularization of the Petitioner;

(ii) The Petitioner shall be paid salary as was paid, till Government takes a decision for regularization of the Petitioner or till attaining the age of 62 years.

7. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed. ___________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 29.06.2026 CM✓/PS/APS – Vns Whether the order is: Speaking ✓ Reasoned

Reportable

Non-reportable ✓

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead